Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 15;16(6):1764-9.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3287. Epub 2010 Mar 9.

The design of phase II clinical trials testing cancer therapeutics: consensus recommendations from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee

Lesley Seymour  1 , S Percy Ivy, Daniel Sargent, David Spriggs, Laurence Baker, Larry Rubinstein, Mark J Ratain, Michael Le Blanc, David Stewart, John Crowley, Susan Groshen, Jeffrey S Humphrey, Pamela West, Donald Berry
Affiliations

The design of phase II clinical trials testing cancer therapeutics: consensus recommendations from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee

Lesley Seymour et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

The optimal design of phase II studies continues to be the subject of vigorous debate, especially studies of newer molecularly targeted agents. The observations that many new therapeutics "fail" in definitive phase III studies, coupled with the numbers of new agents to be tested as well as the increasing costs and complexity of clinical trials, further emphasize the critical importance of robust and efficient phase II design. The Clinical Trial Design Task Force (CTD-TF) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Investigational Drug Steering Committee (IDSC) has published a series of discussion papers on phase II trial design in Clinical Cancer Research. The IDSC has developed formal recommendations about aspects of phase II trial design that are the subject of frequent debate, such as endpoints (response versus progression-free survival), randomization (single-arm designs versus randomization), inclusion of biomarkers, biomarker-based patient enrichment strategies, and statistical design (e.g., two-stage designs versus multiple-group adaptive designs). Although these recommendations in general encourage the use of progression-free survival as the primary endpoint, randomization, inclusion of biomarkers, and incorporation of newer designs, we acknowledge that objective response as an endpoint and single-arm designs remain relevant in certain situations. The design of any clinical trial should always be carefully evaluated and justified based on characteristic specific to the situation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Process for Development of Recommendations
IDSC – Investigational Drug Steering Committee
Figure 2
Figure 2
Process/Flow or Approaches for determination of Phase 2 trial design recommendations. RCT – randomized controlled trial, 20 – secondary, PRO – patient related outcomes, PFS = progression-free survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Types of Phase II Studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adjei A, Christian M, Ivy P. Novel Designs and End Points for Phase II Clinical Trials. Clin Cancer Res March 15. 2009;15:1866–1872. - PubMed
    1. Dhani N, Tu D, Sargent DJ, Seymour L, Moore MJ. Alternate Endpoints for Screening Phase II Studies. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:1873–1882. - PubMed
    1. Shankar LK, Van den Abbeele A, Yap J, Benjamin R, Scheutze S, FitzGerald TJ. Considerations for the Use of Imaging Tools for Phase II Treatment Trials in Oncology. Clin Cancer Res. 15:1891–1897. - PubMed
    1. Rubinstein Larry, Crowley John, Ivy Percy, LeBlanc Michael, Sargent Dan. Randomized Phase II Designs. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:1883–1890. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McShane LM, Hunsberger S, Adjei AA. Effective Incorporation of Biomarkers into Phase II Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:1898–1905. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms