Similar articles

• Conflicting views on the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancy.

  Perry IJ, Wilkinson LS, Shinton RA, Beevers DG. Perry IJ, et al. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Mar;98(3):241-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13386.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991. PMID: 2021560
• Recording diastolic blood pressure in pregnancy.

  Brown MA, Whitworth JA. Brown MA, et al. BMJ. 1991 Jul 13;303(6794):120-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6794.120-d. BMJ. 1991. PMID: 1859992 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
• Blood pressure measurement in pregnancy--a survey of methods used in teaching hospitals in South Australia.

  Duggan PM, Miller J. Duggan PM, et al. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 May;38(2):197-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1998.tb03001.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998. PMID: 9653860
• [Evaluation and surveillance of blood pressure during pregnancy].

  Mounier-Vehier C, Valat-Rigot AS, Vaast P, Puech F, Carré A. Mounier-Vehier C, et al. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1994;23(3):303-7. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1994. PMID: 8051353 Review. French.
• Issues of method-specificity and -dependency of blood pressure data: lack of reporting of methodological specifications.

  de Mey C, Enterling D. de Mey C, et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Jan;53(5):295-7. doi: 10.1007/s002280050381. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998. PMID: 9516025 Review. No abstract available.