Conflicting views on the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancy
- PMID: 2021560
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13386.x
Conflicting views on the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancy
Abstract
Current practice with regard to the technique of blood pressure measurement in pregnancy was assessed by means of a self-completed questionnaire sent to all midwives (116) and obstetricians (11) working in a UK District General Hospital obstetric unit. The response rate was 72% (91 respondents). Over half of the respondents (53%) use the fifth phase diastolic end point (contrary to current recommendations). Of the 75 respondents who had access to a large adult cuff 54 (72%) had used it on 'less than two occasions' over the preceding four weeks. Only 10% (9) of respondents reported that they record blood pressure to the nearest 2 mmHg and 23% (22) reported that they round blood pressure readings to the nearest 10 mmHg. There were diverse views on the interpretation of multiple blood pressure recordings. The conclusion is that compliance with current recommendations on blood pressure measurement technique in pregnancy is poor. There is poor agreement among midwives and obstetricians as to how blood pressure should be recorded in pregnancy.
Comment in
-
Conflicting views on the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancy.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Aug;98(8):842-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13501.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991. PMID: 1911601 No abstract available.
-
Blood pressure measurement in pregnancy.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Mar;98(3):239-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13385.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991. PMID: 2021559 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diversity of blood pressure recording during pregnancy: implications for the hypertensive disorders.Med J Aust. 1992 Mar 2;156(5):306-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb139782.x. Med J Aust. 1992. PMID: 1588860
-
Time poor: rushing decreases the accuracy and reliability of blood pressure measurement technique in pregnancy.Hypertens Pregnancy. 2006;25(2):81-91. doi: 10.1080/10641950600745228. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2006. PMID: 16867915
-
Blood pressure measurement in pregnancy--a survey of methods used in teaching hospitals in South Australia.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 May;38(2):197-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1998.tb03001.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998. PMID: 9653860
-
Midwives' and obstetricians' views on appropriate obstetric sonography in Norway.Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Jun;16:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Jan 3. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018. PMID: 29804752 Review.
-
Blood pressure measurement. Midwifery basics.Pract Midwife. 2001 Oct;4(9):10-4. Pract Midwife. 2001. PMID: 12026670 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Ambulatory versus conventional methods for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(2):CD001231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001231. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002. PMID: 12076403 Free PMC article.
-
Setting and techniques for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 23;8(8):CD012739. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012739.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32748394 Free PMC article.
-
The measurement of blood pressure and the detection of hypertension in children and adolescents.J Hum Hypertens. 2001 Jun;15(6):419-23. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001186. J Hum Hypertens. 2001. PMID: 11439318
-
Electronic Algorithm Is Superior to Hospital Discharge Codes for Diagnoses of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Historical Cohorts.Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Dec;93(12):1707-1719. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.031. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018. PMID: 30522591 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal blood pressure in pregnancy, birth weight, and perinatal mortality in first births: prospective study.BMJ. 2004 Dec 4;329(7478):1312. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38258.566262.7C. Epub 2004 Nov 23. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 15561733 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical