Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Feb;3(1):60-9.
doi: 10.1159/000273208. Epub 2010 Feb 2.

Assessment of weight stigma

Affiliations
Review

Assessment of weight stigma

Enrica N Ruggs et al. Obes Facts. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

The purpose of this review article is to familiarize readers with the common methodologies used to assess weight stigma. This article explores the most frequent ways weight stigma is assessed, offers relevant empirical examples of each methodology, examines the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, and offers recommendations for strengthening research assessment of weight stigma for the future. Furthermore, this article highlights 4 dimensions that are important to consider when assessing weight stigma, regardless of the research methodology used.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Health Organization: Obesity and Overweight 2006 www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html.
    1. Finkelstein EA, Ruhm CJ, Kosa KM. Economic causes and consequences of obesity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:239–257. - PubMed
    1. Bray GA. Medical consequences of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metable. 2004;89:2583–2589. - PubMed
    1. Must A, Strauss RS. Risks and consequences of childhood and adolescent obesity. Int J Obes. 1999;23:S2–S11. - PubMed
    1. Dovidio JF, Major B, Crocker J, Stigma: introduction and overview . The Social Psychology of Stigma. In: Heatherton TF, Kleck RE, Hebl MR, Hull JG, editors. New York: Guilford Press; 2000. pp. pp. 1–29.