Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Oct;17(5):541-8.
doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283383f47.

Control of baseline cardiovascular risk factors in the SU-FOL-OM3 study cohort: does the localization of the arterial event matter?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Control of baseline cardiovascular risk factors in the SU-FOL-OM3 study cohort: does the localization of the arterial event matter?

Claire Vesin et al. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Aim and method: No data are currently available on the prevalence and control of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in secondary prevention depending on the cardiac or cerebral localization of the ischemic disease. We investigated the prevalence and control of modifiable CV risk factors, as well as the determinants of CV risk factors' control and adequate treatment in a secondary prevention cohort, the SU-FOL-OM3 study cohort, to determine the role of the localization of the ischemic disease including events.

Results: A total of 2491 patients were included in the study. The prevalence of all modifiable risk factors was high in both coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) groups. Control of all risk factors and the presence of antiplatelet medication were noted in 29.6% of patients with coronary heart disease and 11% of patients with CVD. The cardiac localization of the including event was independently associated with the control of each of the risk factors studied (hypertension, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, smoking) and to the control of all risk factors present and prescription of antiplatelet therapy with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.72 (1.97-3.75).

Conclusion: There is a need to improve the control of CV risk factors in secondary prevention patients. This is particularly crucial for patients with CVD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources