Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep-Oct;25(5):375-82.
doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181d27fe3.

Measuring outcome in traumatic brain injury treatment trials: recommendations from the traumatic brain injury clinical trials network

Affiliations

Measuring outcome in traumatic brain injury treatment trials: recommendations from the traumatic brain injury clinical trials network

Emilia Bagiella et al. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) involves several aspects of a patient's condition, including physical, mental, emotional, cognitive, social, and functional changes. Therefore, a clinical trial with individuals with TBI should consider outcome measures that reflect their global status.

Methods: We present the work of the National Institute of Child Health and Development-sponsored Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials Network Outcome Measures subcommittee and its choice of outcome measures for a phase III clinical trial of patients with complicated mild to severe TBI.

Results: On the basis of theoretical and practical considerations, the subcommittee recommended the adoption of a core of 9 measures that cover 2 different areas of recovery: functional and cognitive. These measures are the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale; the Controlled Oral Word Association Test; the Trail Making Test, Parts A and B; the California Verbal Learning Test-II; the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III Digit Span subtest; the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III Processing Speed Index; and the Stroop Color-Word Matching Test, Parts 1 and 2.

Conclusions: The statistical methods proposed to analyze these measures using a global test procedure, along with research and methodological and regulatory issues involved with the use of multiple outcomes in a clinical trial, are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thurman DJ, Alverson C, Dunn KA, Guerrero J, Sniezek JE. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14(6):602–615. - PubMed
    1. Ragnarsson KT. Traumatic brain injury research since the 1998 NIH Consensus Conference: accomplishments and unmet goals. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(5):379–387. - PubMed
    1. Tilley BC, Marler J, Geller NL, et al. Use of a global test for multiple outcomes in stroke trials with application to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke t-PA Stroke Trial. Stroke. 1996;27(11):2136–2142. - PubMed
    1. Zafonte R, Friedewald WT, Lee SM, et al. Citicoline brain injury treatment (COBRIT) trial: design and methods. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26:2207–2216. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Temkin NR, Anderson GD, Winn HR, et al. Magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(1):29–38. - PubMed

Publication types