Changes in corticospinal excitability evoked by common peroneal nerve stimulation depend on stimulation frequency
- PMID: 20217400
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2202-x
Changes in corticospinal excitability evoked by common peroneal nerve stimulation depend on stimulation frequency
Abstract
The afferent volley generated during neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can increase the excitability of the human corticospinal (CS) pathway. This study was designed to determine the effect of different frequencies of NMES applied over the common peroneal nerve on changes in CS excitability for the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. We hypothesized that higher frequencies of stimulation would produce larger increases in CS excitability than lower frequencies. NMES was applied at 10, 50, 100, or 200 Hz during separate sessions held at least 48 h apart. The stimulation was delivered in a 20 s on, 20 s off cycle for 40 min using a 1 ms pulse width. The intensity of stimulation was set to evoke an M-wave in response to a single pulse that was 15% of the maximal M-wave. CS excitability was evaluated by the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in TA evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. MEPs were recorded immediately before and after the 40 min of NMES and in each 20 s "off" period. For each subject, MEPs recorded during three successive "off" periods were averaged together (n = 9 MEPs), providing a temporal resolution of 2 min for assessing changes in CS excitability. When delivering NMES at 100 Hz, MEPs became significantly elevated from those evoked before the stimulation at the 24th min, and there was a twofold increase in MEP amplitude after 40 min. NMES delivered at 10, 50, and 200 Hz did not significantly alter MEP amplitude. The amplitude of MEPs evoked in soleus and vastus medialis followed similar patterns as those evoked simultaneously in TA, but these changes were mostly not of statistical significance. There were no changes in the ratio of maximal H-reflex to maximal M-wave in TA or soleus. These experiments demonstrate a frequency-dependent effect of NMES on CS excitability for TA and show that, under the conditions of the present study, 100-Hz stimulation was more effective than 10, 50, and 200 Hz. This effect of NMES on CS excitability was strongest in the stimulated muscle and may be mediated primarily at a supraspinal level. These results contribute to a growing body of knowledge about how the afferent volley generated during NMES influences the CNS and have implications for identifying optimal NMES parameters to augment CS excitability for rehabilitation of dorsiflexion after CNS injury.
Similar articles
-
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation has a global effect on corticospinal excitability for leg muscles and a focused effect for hand muscles.Exp Brain Res. 2011 Mar;209(3):355-63. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2556-8. Epub 2011 Feb 1. Exp Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21286692
-
The pulse duration of electrical stimulation influences H-reflexes but not corticospinal excitability for tibialis anterior.Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;92(10):821-5. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2014-0195. Epub 2014 Aug 19. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014. PMID: 25223503
-
Electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve and its effects on the relationship between corticomuscular coherence and motor control in healthy adults.BMC Neurosci. 2021 Oct 13;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12868-021-00665-w. BMC Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34645385 Free PMC article.
-
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Oct;111(10):2409-26. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2087-9. Epub 2011 Jul 30. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011. PMID: 21805156 Review.
-
Motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation: interpreting a simple measure of a complex system.J Physiol. 2023 Jul;601(14):2827-2851. doi: 10.1113/JP281885. Epub 2023 Jun 8. J Physiol. 2023. PMID: 37254441 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Alteration of synergistic muscle activity following neuromuscular electrical stimulation of one muscle.Brain Behav. 2012 Sep;2(5):640-6. doi: 10.1002/brb3.87. Epub 2012 Aug 24. Brain Behav. 2012. PMID: 23139909 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Paired-Pulse Electrical Stimulation on the Activity of Cortical Circuits.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Dec 22;9:671. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00671. eCollection 2015. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26733847 Free PMC article.
-
From pulse width modulated TENS to cortical modulation: based on EEG functional connectivity analysis.Front Neurosci. 2023 Aug 2;17:1239068. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1239068. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37600002 Free PMC article.
-
Wide-pulse, high-frequency, low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation has potential for targeted strengthening of an intrinsic foot muscle: a feasibility study.J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 May 3;11:16. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0258-1. eCollection 2018. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018. PMID: 29755590 Free PMC article.
-
High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation modulates interhemispheric inhibition in healthy humans.J Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan 1;117(1):467-475. doi: 10.1152/jn.00355.2016. Epub 2016 Nov 9. J Neurophysiol. 2017. PMID: 27832594 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources