Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation
- PMID: 20219094
- PMCID: PMC2847568
- DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-9-27
Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation
Abstract
Background: Friedewald's formula for the estimation of LDL-C concentration is the most often used formula in clinical practice. A recent formula by Anandaraja and colleagues for LDL-C estimation still needs to be evaluated before it is extensively applied in diagnosis. In the present study we validated existing formulas and derived a more accurate formula to determine LDL-C in a Serbian population.
Methods: Our study included 2053 patients with TG < or = 4.52 mmol/L. In an initial group of 1010 patients, Friedewald's and Anandaraja's formulas were compared to a direct homogenous method for LDL-C determination. The obtained results allowed us to modify Friedewald's formula and apply it in a second group of patients.
Results: The mean LDL-C concentrations were 3.9 +/- 1.09 mmol/L, 3.63 +/- 1.06 mmol/L and 3.72 +/- 1.04 mmol/L measured by a direct homogenous assay (D-LDL-C), calculated by Friedewald's formula (F-LDL-C) and calculated by Anandaraja's formula (A-LDL-C), respectively in the 1010 patients. The Student's paired t-test showed that D-LDL-C values were significantly higher than F-LDL-C and A-LDL-C values (p < 0.001). The Passing-Bablok regression analysis indicated good correlation between calculated and measured LDL-Cs (r > 0.89). Using lipoprotein values from the initial group we modified Friedewald's formula by replacing the term 2.2 with 3. The new modified formula for LDL-C estimation (S-LDL-C) showed no statistically significant difference compared to D-LDL-C. The absolute bias between these two methods was -0.06 +/- 0.37 mmol/L with a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.96).
Conclusions: Our modified formula for LDL-C estimation appears to be more accurate than both Friedewald's and Anandaraja's formulas when applied to a Serbian population.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Does LDL-C Estimation Using Anandaraja's Formula Give a Better Agreement with Direct LDL-C Estimation than the Friedewald's Formula?Indian J Clin Biochem. 2012 Apr;27(2):127-33. doi: 10.1007/s12291-011-0186-3. Epub 2012 Mar 24. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2012. PMID: 23543806 Free PMC article.
-
LDL cholesterol estimation using the Anandaraja's and Friedewald's formulas in schizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotic drugs.Clin Biochem. 2008 Aug;41(12):1002-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Apr 27. Clin Biochem. 2008. PMID: 18474233
-
Martin's Formula As the Most Suitable Method for Estimation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Indian Population.J Lab Physicians. 2023 Jul 13;15(4):545-551. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768951. eCollection 2023 Dec. J Lab Physicians. 2023. PMID: 37780882 Free PMC article.
-
[New clinical application of direct and chemical measurement of low density lipoprotein cholesterol-estimation of compositional changes in triglyceride-rich lipoprotein fraction].Nihon Rinsho. 1999 Dec;57(12):2745-53. Nihon Rinsho. 1999. PMID: 10638207 Review. Japanese.
-
[Mild hypercholesterolemia. Diagnosis and prognosis].Recenti Prog Med. 1997 Jun;88(6):255-63. Recenti Prog Med. 1997. PMID: 9289761 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Correlation between monocyte chemoattractant protein-1/chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 and coronary plaque characteristics.Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2020 Sep;245(15):1335-1343. doi: 10.1177/1535370220941424. Epub 2020 Jul 8. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2020. PMID: 32640896 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level calculated using the modified Martin/Hopkins estimation or the Friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.Arch Med Sci. 2020 Aug 3;18(3):577-586. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.97847. eCollection 2022. Arch Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 35591827 Free PMC article.
-
A novel equation for the estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the Saudi Arabian population: a derivation and validation study.Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):5478. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55921-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38443422 Free PMC article.
-
Measured versus calculated LDL-cholesterol in subjects with type 2 diabetes.Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):955-60. doi: 10.12669/pjms.324.9896. Pak J Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27648047 Free PMC article.
-
The consumption of ultra-processed foods was associated with adiposity, but not with metabolic indicators in a prospective cohort study of Chilean preschool children.BMC Med. 2024 Aug 26;22(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03556-z. BMC Med. 2024. PMID: 39183281 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) Lancet. 1994;344:1383–1389. - PubMed
-
- The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349–1357. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811053391902. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bachorick PS, Ross JW. For the National Cholesterol Education Program Working Group on Lipoprotein Measurements. National Cholesterol Education Program recommendations for measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: executive summary. Clin Chem. 1995;41:1414–1420. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous