Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 10:11:46.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-46.

Load and speed effects on the cervical flexion relaxation phenomenon

Affiliations

Load and speed effects on the cervical flexion relaxation phenomenon

Jean-Philippe Pialasse et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: The flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) represents a well-studied neuromuscular response that occurs in the lumbar and cervical spine. However, the cervical spine FRP has not been investigated extensively, and the speed of movement and loading effects remains to be characterized. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the influence of load and speed on cervical FRP electromyographic (EMG) and kinematic parameters and to assess the measurement of cervical FRP kinematic and EMG parameter repeatability.

Methods: Eighteen healthy adults (6 women and 12 men), aged 20 to 39 years, participated in this study. They undertook 2 sessions in which they had to perform a standardized cervical flexion/extension movement in 3 phases: complete cervical flexion; the static period in complete cervical flexion; and extension with return to the initial position. Two different rhythm conditions and 3 different loading conditions were applied to assess load and speed effects. Kinematic and EMG data were collected, and dependent variables included angles corresponding to the onset and cessation of myoelectric silence as well as the root mean square (RMS) values of EMG signals. Repeatability was examined in the first session and between the 2 sessions.

Results: Statistical analyses revealed a significant load effect (P < 0.001). An augmented load led to increased FRP onset and cessation angles. No load x speed interaction effect was detected in the kinematics data. A significant load effect (P < 0.001) was observed on RMS values in all phases of movement, while a significant speed effect (P < 0.001) could be seen only during the extension phase. Load x speed interaction effect was noted in the extension phase, where higher loads and faster rhythm generated significantly greater muscle activation. Intra-session and inter-session repeatability was good for the EMG and kinematic parameters.

Conclusions: The load increase evoked augmented FRP onset and cessation angles as well as heightened muscle activation. Such increments may reflect the need to enhance spinal stability under loading conditions. The kinematic and EMG parameters showed promising repeatability. Further studies are needed to assess kinematic and EMG differences between healthy subjects and patients with neck pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental setting of a participant in loaded (a), no load (b) and counterweighted (c) conditions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Typical subject EMG (grey) and cervical flexion angle (black) during a slow-speed-without-load trial.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Load effect on onset and cessation angles. A - Illustrates mean (SE) angles expressed in degrees. Light grey represents 700 g weighted, dark grey, no weight, and black, -300 g counterweighted conditions. B - Illustrates mean (SE) angles in percentages. Light grey represents 700 g weighted, dark grey, no weight, and black, -300 g counterweighted conditions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Speed effect on onset and cessation angles. A - Illustrates mean (SE) angles expressed in degrees. Grey represents the slow speed condition, and black, the fast speed condition. B - Illustrates mean (SE) angles expressed in percentages. Grey represents the slow speed condition, and black, the fast speed condition.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Load × speed interaction effect on extension phase normalized EMG RMS. Vertical bars denote standard errors. High speed is represented by the interrupted line, and slow speed, by the continuous line.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Colloca CJ, Hinrichs RN. The biomechanical and clinical significance of the lumbar erector spinae flexion-relaxation phenomenon: a review of literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28(8):623–631. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.08.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord. 1992;5(4):390–396. doi: 10.1097/00002517-199212000-00002. discussion 397. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord. 1992;5(4):383–389. doi: 10.1097/00002517-199212000-00001. discussion 397. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson EA, Oddsson LI, Grundstrom H, Nilsson J, Thorstensson A. EMG activities of the quadratus lumborum and erector spinae muscles during flexion-relaxation and other motor tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1996;11(7):392–400. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(96)00033-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGill S, Juker D, Kropf P. Appropriately placed surface EMG electrodes reflect deep muscle activity (psoas, quadratus lumborum, abdominal wall) in the lumbar spine. J Biomech. 1996;29(11):1503–1507. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)84547-7. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances