Margin control in robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy: what are the REAL outcomes?
- PMID: 20219561
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.08.009
Margin control in robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy: what are the REAL outcomes?
Abstract
Our institutional experience and relevant literature on surgical margin rates with laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy are summarized. Differences in surgical margins were assessed between patients undergoing open or robotic-assisted prostatectomy by experienced surgeons, and placed in context with a review of the literature. Surgical margins and location were similar between patients undergoing open or robotic prostatectomy. Pathologic stage, baseline prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score all impacted the risk of a positive surgical margin. Experienced surgeons can achieve comparable outcomes in terms of surgical margins. Disease burden plays a significant role in positive surgical margins.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17936849
-
Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.Hum Pathol. 2012 Feb;43(2):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 Aug 4. Hum Pathol. 2012. PMID: 21820147
-
The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.Can J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(2):3994-9. Can J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18405448
-
Role of robotics for prostate cancer.Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):65-8. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831aedcf. Curr Opin Urol. 2009. PMID: 19057219 Review.
-
Open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: optimizing the surgical approach.Surg Oncol. 2009 Sep;18(3):233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Mar 14. Surg Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19286370 Review.
Cited by
-
The comparative oncologic effectiveness of available management strategies for clinically localized prostate cancer.Urol Oncol. 2017 Feb;35(2):51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 Apr 28. Urol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27133953 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.J Robot Surg. 2020 Feb;14(1):167-175. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00954-x. Epub 2019 Apr 5. J Robot Surg. 2020. PMID: 30953271
-
Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Kaiser Permanente Southern California: 15-Year Experience.Perm J. 2019;23:17-233. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-233. Perm J. 2019. PMID: 30939263 Free PMC article.
-
High surgeon volume and positive surgical margins can predict the risk of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Sep 24;11:1756287219878283. doi: 10.1177/1756287219878283. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2019. PMID: 31579118 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010. PMID: 23074405 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical