Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jul;126(1):181-186.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181da87df.

Major morbidity and mortality rates in craniofacial surgery: an analysis of 8101 major procedures

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Major morbidity and mortality rates in craniofacial surgery: an analysis of 8101 major procedures

Marcin Czerwinski et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The first combined evaluation of morbidity and mortality rates in craniofacial surgery was published 30 years ago; many surgeons believe these procedures have since become safer. The authors performed a contemporary evaluation of craniofacial morbidity and mortality rates to help surgeons more accurately counsel families about current risks, and to gain insight into reducing future incidences.

Methods: This study used two methodologies to capture all serious morbidities and mortalities associated with major craniofacial procedures between 1990 and 2008: a comprehensive two-center retrospective review (Dallas and Seattle), and an Internet-based survey sent to all North American craniofacial centers.

Results: Combining the two-center data with the survey results yielded a database of 7328 intracranial and 773 subcranial procedures, for a total of 8101 major craniofacial procedures. The combined intracranial major morbidity rate was less than 0.1 percent, and the combined mortality rate was 0.1 percent. Of the eight perioperative deaths following intracranial procedures, four (50 percent) intracranial mortalities were directly attributed to blood loss. The combined subcranial procedure major morbidity rate was 0.1 percent and the mortality rate was 0.3 percent (airway related). Comparing the earliest published intracranial mortality rate to our current review revealed a statistically significant reduction in incidence (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The incidence rates for serious morbidities and mortalities among major craniofacial procedures have significantly fallen since first published. On the basis of these analyses, the authors believe that a greater focus on protocols for airway management, blood salvage and replacement, age-appropriate deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, and timing of subcranial midfacial advancements might result in further reductions in craniofacial mortality rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oritz-Monasterio F. Notes on the history of craniofacial surgery. In: Jackson IT, Munro IR, Salyer KE, et al, eds. Atlas of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery. St. Louis: Mosby; 1982: vii–xii.
    1. Whitaker LA, Munro IR, Salyer KE, et al. Combined report of problems and complications in 793 craniofacial operations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;64:198–203.
    1. Munro IR, Sabatier RE. An analysis of 12 years of craniomaxillofacial surgery in Toronto. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:29–35.
    1. Poole MD. Complications in craniofacial surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1988;41:608–613.
    1. Stieg PE, Mulliken JB. Neurosurgical complications in craniofacial surgery. Neurosurg Clin North Am. 1991;2:703–708.

MeSH terms