Calculating pulmonary-mode-lethality risk avoidance associated with radionuclide decorporation countermeasures related to a radiological terrorism incident
- PMID: 20221293
- PMCID: PMC2836159
- DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.09-026.Scott
Calculating pulmonary-mode-lethality risk avoidance associated with radionuclide decorporation countermeasures related to a radiological terrorism incident
Abstract
Planning for and managing radiological terrorism incidents that involve the release of radionuclides from a dirty bomb requires considering the potential lifesaving impact of protective radionuclide decorporation countermeasures (e.g., lung lavage). Lung lavage therapy could prevent deaths via the pulmonary mode (which involves radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis) by reducing the radiation dose to the lung from inhaled radionuclides. The risk avoidance (RAV) assessment framework introduced in a related paper is used to evaluate the pulmonary-lethality-mode RAV due to lung lavage and the associated risk avoidance proportion (RAP) for hypothetical inhalation-exposure scenarios. The lethality RAV is a measure (on a scale from 0 to 1) of the actual risk reduction associated with the applied protective countermeasures. The lethality RAP is the lethality RAV divided by the lethality risk when no protective countermeasures are employed and is a useful measure of the efficacy of the countermeasures applied. Examples of pulmonary-mode lethality RAV and RAP calculations are presented for hypothetical scenarios involving lung lavage to remove beta and/or gamma-emitting radionuclides that are inhaled in highly insoluble forms. The approach presented could be used to develop optimal schemes for applying lung lavage therapy following a terrorist incident involving a dirty bomb.
Keywords: Risk; countermeasures; decorporation; lethality; radionuclide.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Calculating hematopoietic-mode-lethality risk avoidance associated with radionuclide decorporation countermeasures related to a radiological terrorism incident.Dose Response. 2009 Oct 8;7(4):332-57. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-022.Scott. Dose Response. 2009. PMID: 20011652 Free PMC article.
-
Medical management of victims contaminated with radionuclides after a "dirty bomb" attack.Mil Med Res. 2018 Aug 6;5(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40779-018-0174-5. Mil Med Res. 2018. PMID: 30086798 Free PMC article.
-
Dirty bomb source term characterization and downwind dispersion: Review of experimental evidence.J Environ Radioact. 2023 Jul;263:107166. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107166. Epub 2023 Apr 12. J Environ Radioact. 2023. PMID: 37059048 Review.
-
Preparing for a "dirty bomb" attack: the optimum mix of medical countermeasure resources.Mil Med Res. 2021 Jan 17;8(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00291-3. Mil Med Res. 2021. PMID: 33455578 Free PMC article.
-
Reconsidering Current Decorporation Strategies after Incorporation of Radionuclides.Health Phys. 2016 Aug;111(2):204-11. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000473. Health Phys. 2016. PMID: 27356066 Review.
References
-
- Breitenstein BD. The medical management of unintentional radionuclide intakes. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2003;105(1–4):495–497. - PubMed
-
- CDC (Centers for Disease Control) 2005Frequently asked questions (FAQs) about dirty bombs Available at http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/dirtybombs.asp
-
- DHS (Department of Homeland Security) 2003Radiological dispersion devices fact sheet Available at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/press_release_0085.shtm
-
- DHHS (Department of Health & Human Services) 2009Radiological dispersal devices (RDDs) Available at http://www.remm.nlm.gov/rdd.htm
-
- Muggenburg BA, Boecker BB, Hahn FF, McClellan RO. Lung lavage therapy to lessen the biological effects of inhaled 144Ce in dogs. Radiat Res. 1990;124(2):147–155. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources