Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Jun;31(6):785-94.
doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1343-3. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

Meta-analysis: diagnostic value of serum anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis: diagnostic value of serum anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Xue Qin et al. Rheumatol Int. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Conventional tests are not always helpful in making a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to comprehensively and quantitatively summarize the evidence on the accuracy of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin (MCV) assay in the diagnosis of RA. A comprehensive meta-review of data on the accuracy of MCV concentrations in the diagnosis of RA were carried out from 16 published studies. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize the overall test performance. The summary estimates for MCV in the diagnosis of RA were: sensitivity 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.78], specificity 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.90), positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 7.24 (95% CI 5.60-9.36), negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.28 (95% CI 0.23-0.34) and diagnostic odds ratio 29.66 (95% CI 21.09-41.71). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.92. Data from meta-analysis suggest the accuracy of MCV assay in the diagnosis of RA is high, but ultimately clinician must consider the results of MCV tests combing with other conventional examinations and the clinical feature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Invest. 1998 Jan 1;101(1):273-81 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;36(3):491-500 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Aug;56(8):2503-11 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2001 Dec 15;20(23):3625-33 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources