Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 20222968
- PMCID: PMC2851659
- DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-11
Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. It is implicated in the development of a variety of chronic disease states and is associated with increased levels of inflammation and oxidative stress. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of Medifast's meal replacement program (MD) on body weight, body composition, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress among obese individuals following a period of weight loss and weight maintenance compared to a an isocaloric, food-based diet (FB).
Methods: This 40-week randomized, controlled clinical trial included 90 obese adults with a body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 50 kg/m2, randomly assigned to one of two weight loss programs for 16 weeks and then followed for a 24-week period of weight maintenance. The dietary interventions consisted of Medifast's meal replacement program for weight loss and weight maintenance, or a self-selected, isocaloric, food-based meal plan.
Results: Weight loss at 16 weeks was significantly better in the Medifast group (MD) versus the food-based group (FB) (12.3% vs. 6.9%), and while significantly more weight was regained during weight maintenance on MD versus FB, overall greater weight loss was achieved on MD versus FB. Significantly more of the MD participants lost >or= 5% of their initial weight at week 16 (93% vs. 55%) and week 40 (62% vs. 30%). There was no difference in satiety observed between the two groups during the weight loss phase. Significant improvements in body composition were also observed in MD participants compared to FB at week 16 and week 40. At week 40, both groups experienced improvements in biochemical outcomes and other clinical indicators.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that the meal replacement diet plan evaluated was an effective strategy for producing robust initial weight loss and for achieving improvements in a number of health-related parameters during weight maintenance, including inflammation and oxidative stress, two key factors more recently shown to underlie our most common chronic diseases.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01011491.
Similar articles
-
Randomized controlled trial of the Medifast 5 & 1 Plan for weight loss.Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Dec;37(12):1571-8. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.43. Epub 2013 Apr 9. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013. PMID: 23567927 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of a Medifast meal replacement program on weight, body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese adults: a multicenter systematic retrospective chart review study.Nutr J. 2015 Aug 6;14:77. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0062-8. Nutr J. 2015. PMID: 26245279 Free PMC article.
-
Weight loss in a UK commercial all meal provision study: a randomised controlled trial.J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Aug;27(4):377-83. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12171. Epub 2013 Oct 23. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014. PMID: 24147918 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Do meal replacement drinks have a role in diabetes management?Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Clin Perform Programme. 2006;11:171-181. doi: 10.1159/000094450. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Clin Perform Programme. 2006. PMID: 16820739 Review.
-
[Simple obesity in children. A study on the role of nutritional factors].Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2006 Jan-Mar;10(1):3-191. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2006. PMID: 16733288 Review. Polish.
Cited by
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of meal replacements for weight loss.Obes Rev. 2019 Apr;20(4):569-587. doi: 10.1111/obr.12816. Epub 2019 Jan 24. Obes Rev. 2019. PMID: 30675990 Free PMC article.
-
A digital health weight-loss intervention in severe obesity.Digit Health. 2020 Mar 4;6:2055207620910279. doi: 10.1177/2055207620910279. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2020. PMID: 32180992 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of meal replacements therapy on blood pressure and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clin Hypertens. 2025 May 1;31:e17. doi: 10.5646/ch.2025.31.e17. eCollection 2025. Clin Hypertens. 2025. PMID: 40336505 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dietary macronutrients and food consumption as determinants of long-term weight change in adult populations: a systematic literature review.Food Nutr Res. 2012;56. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v56i0.19103. Epub 2012 Aug 13. Food Nutr Res. 2012. PMID: 22893781 Free PMC article.
-
Executive Functioning as a Predictor of Weight Loss and Physical Activity Outcomes.Ann Behav Med. 2019 Aug 29;53(10):909-917. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz001. Ann Behav Med. 2019. PMID: 30689688 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Ogden CL, Carroll MD, McDowell MA, Flegal KM. Obesity among Adults in the United States - No Statistically Significant Change since 2003-2004. United States Department of Health and Human Services - NCHS Data Brief. 2007. - PubMed
-
- Gale SM, Castracane VD, Mantzoros CS. Energy homeostasis, obesity, and eating disorders: recent advances in endocrinology. J Nutr. 2004;134:295–98. - PubMed