Withdrawal from genetic counselling for cancer
- PMID: 20223026
- PMCID: PMC2837064
- DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-3-1-19
Withdrawal from genetic counselling for cancer
Abstract
Background: A substantial minority of individuals who initially apply for genetic counselling for breast/ovarian cancer withdraw at an early stage from the counselling process. This study investigated the self-reported reasons for early withdrawal and the factors associated significantly with such withdrawal.
Methods: Self-report questionnaires were mailed to 83 women who had applied for genetic counselling for breast/ovarian cancer but who subsequently withdrew from the counselling process (the "withdrawers"). A comparison group of 105 women who had completed the genetic counselling (the "attendees") received a similar questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed sociodemographic characteristics, reasons for applying for genetic counselling, general distress (MHI-5), cancer-specific distress (IES), and cancer worries. For those women who discontinued the counselling, reasons for withdrawal were also assessed.
Results: The primary reasons given for withdrawing from counselling were difficulties in anticipating the consequences of genetic counselling (28%), and worries about being unable to adequately cope with an unfavourable test result (20%). Compared to the attendees, the withdrawers were significantly younger, more frequently asymptomatic, more often the first and only member of the family to apply for counselling, and less worried about cancer. Current levels of cancer-specific distress and general distress were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion: Younger women, those without a history of cancer, and those who are first in their family to apply are more likely to withdraw prematurely from genetic counselling for breast/ovarian cancer. These withdrawers have no elevated levels of distress. However, a substantial percentage of individuals discontinue counselling due to concerns about their (in)ability to cope with a possible unfavourable test outcome. This suggests that greater attention should be paid to ways of coping with test results during the very first contact with the clinic.
Similar articles
-
Colorectal cancer in the family: psychosocial distress and social issues in the years following genetic counselling.Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2007 Jun 15;5(2):59-66. doi: 10.1186/1897-4287-5-2-59. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2007. PMID: 19725985 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer.Br J Cancer. 1999 Feb;79(5-6):868-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690139. Br J Cancer. 1999. PMID: 10070883 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological Distress and Coping Ability of Women at High Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer before Undergoing Genetic Counseling-An Exploratory Study from Germany.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 19;18(8):4338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084338. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33921890 Free PMC article.
-
Individual fertility assessment and counselling in women of reproductive age.Dan Med J. 2016 Oct;63(10):B5292. Dan Med J. 2016. PMID: 27697140 Review.
-
Improving the referral process for familial breast cancer genetic counselling: findings of three randomised controlled trials of two interventions.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Feb;9(3):iii-iv, 1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta9030. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 15694064 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the performance of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) breast and ovarian genetic/familial high risk assessment referral criteria for breast cancer women in an Asian surgical breast clinic.Gland Surg. 2017 Feb;6(1):35-42. doi: 10.21037/gs.2016.11.05. Gland Surg. 2017. PMID: 28210550 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with an individuals' decision to withdraw from genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations: are personality traits involved?Fam Cancer. 2011 Sep;10(3):581-9. doi: 10.1007/s10689-011-9454-x. Fam Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21604195
-
Communication Between Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Inconclusive Genetic Test Results and Their Daughters and Sisters Years After Testing.J Genet Couns. 2016 Jun;25(3):461-71. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9889-6. Epub 2015 Oct 8. J Genet Couns. 2016. PMID: 26446011
-
Development and Pilot Testing of a Decision Aid for Genomic Research Participants Notified of Clinically Actionable Research Findings for Cancer Risk.J Genet Couns. 2018 Sep;27(5):1055-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0223-y. Epub 2018 Feb 17. J Genet Couns. 2018. PMID: 29455319
-
Preferences for Genetic Testing to Predict the Risk of Developing Hereditary Cancer: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.Med Decis Making. 2024 Apr;44(3):252-268. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241227425. Epub 2024 Feb 7. Med Decis Making. 2024. PMID: 38323553 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Liu Q, Cochran C, Bennett LM, Ding W, Bell R, Rosenthal J, Hussey C, Thanh T, McClure M, Frye C, Hattier T, Phelps R, Haugen-Strano A, Katcher H, Yakumo K, Gholami Z, Shaffer D, Stone S, Bayer S, Waray C, Bogden R, Dayananth P, Ward J, Tonin P, Narod S, Bristow P, Norris F, Helvering L, Morrison P, Rosteck P, Lai M, Barrett JC, Lewis C, Neuhausen S, Cannon-Albright L, Goldgar D, Wiseman R, Kamb A, Skolnick M. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994;266(5182):66–71. doi: 10.1126/science.7545954. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources