Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;92(3):193-7.
doi: 10.1308/003588410X12628812458770. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy: what are the long-term prospects?

Jennifer E Rusby  1 , Ruth A Waters, Peter G Nightingale, David W England
Affiliations

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy: what are the long-term prospects?

Jennifer E Rusby et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy has known psychological and financial advantages but it is difficult to compare the outcome of various methods of reconstruction. Re-operation rates are an objective measure of surgical intervention required to attain and maintain acceptable cosmesis.

Patients and methods: A series of 95 patients (110 immediate reconstructions) was analysed for number of re-operations required within 5 years of initial surgery, magnitude of procedures, 'survival' of the reconstruction and effect of radiotherapy.

Results: Although more intervention was seen in patients with implant-based reconstruction and the time-course over which autologous and implant-based reconstructions fail is different these did not reach statistical significance. Radiotherapy has a significant effect on failure of implant-based reconstruction.

Conclusions: Long-term, large studies of immediate reconstruction are required to assess adequately the impact of type of reconstruction on re-operation rates. The National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit is ideally placed to provide answers to remaining questions about longevity of immediate breast reconstruction and the effect that late failure has on patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rate of re-operations over time since primary reconstruction. The table reports the number of patients ‘at risk’ for each year of follow-up.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curve of survival of autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier graph of survival of implant-based reconstruction according to exposure to radiation. RT, prior radiotherapy or adjuvant irradiation; no RT, no irradiation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Khoo A, Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, et al. A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:964–8. discussion 969-70. - PubMed
    1. Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little 3rd JW. Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76:713–8. - PubMed
    1. Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:455–62. - PubMed
    1. Greenway RM, Schlossberg L, Dooley WC. Fifteen-year series of skin-sparing mastectomy for stage 0 to 2 breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;190:918–22. - PubMed
    1. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2265–74. - PubMed

MeSH terms