Adequate lymph node assessment for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma
- PMID: 20224368
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d3d2b2
Adequate lymph node assessment for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma
Abstract
Objective: To examine the importance of adequate lymph node sampling in staging of extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHBDCA).
Summary of background data: The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual (sixth edition) states that histologic examination of at least 3 lymph nodes is required for adequate N stage determination for EHBDCA. This recommendation has not been validated; however, there has been no comparative assessment of the proximal versus distal bile duct cancer.
Methods: A total of 257 patients (144 hilar cholangiocarcinoma [HCCA] and 113 distal bile duct adenocarcinoma [DBDCA]) who underwent curative intent resection (1987-2007) were analyzed; patients with gallbladder cancer were excluded. Final disease staging, including lymph node status and total number of nodes examined (total lymph node count), was obtained from the final pathology report. Differences in disease-specific survival, according to nodal status, were compared using the log-rank test. R1 resections (n = 51) were excluded from this analysis.
Results: Metastasis to regional lymph nodes was noted in 89 patients (34.6%) and was an independent prognostic factor of poor survival (median disease-specific survival N0 vs. N1: 53.5 vs. 19.3 months, P < 0.0001, hazard ratio = 2.1 [95% CI: 1.4-3.2]). The median total lymph node count was 6 (range: 0-42), and was significantly lower for HCCA compared with DBDCA (median = 3 [range: 0-16] vs. 12 [range: 1-42], P < 0.001, respectively). For the entire cohort, patients who underwent R0 resection and were classified as N0, based on total lymph node count <11, had a disease-specific survival that was significantly worse than that of patients classified as N0 based on total lymph node count >or=11 (52.6 +/- 9.8 months vs. not reached, P = 0.008). The estimated optimal total lymph node count for HCCA differed from that of DBDCA (n = 7 vs. n = 11, respectively).
Conclusions: Adequate lymph nodes assessment of EHBDCA, based on the current AJCC recommendations, results in understaging of these tumors. With respect to the optimal total lymph node count, HCCA, and DBDCA should be considered separately.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of nodal status for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: location, number, or ratio of involved nodes.Ann Surg. 2013 Apr;257(4):718-25. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182822277. Ann Surg. 2013. PMID: 23407295
-
The Prognostic Importance of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Patients Undergoing Curative Resection Followed by Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer.J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Oct;19(10):1833-41. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2898-9. Epub 2015 Aug 4. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015. PMID: 26239516
-
Prognostic Significance of the Lymph Node Ratio in Surgical Patients With Distal Cholangiocarcinoma.J Surg Res. 2019 Apr;236:2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.10.044. Epub 2018 Dec 4. J Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 30694756
-
[Criteria for the resectability of malignant extrahepatic bile duct tumours].Zentralbl Chir. 2012 Feb;137(1):32-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283887. Epub 2012 Feb 16. Zentralbl Chir. 2012. PMID: 22344835 Review. German.
-
Differences in Lymph Node Metastases Patterns Among Non-pancreatic Periampullary Cancers and Histologic Subtypes: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study and Systematic Review.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4654-4664. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15213-z. Epub 2024 Apr 11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38602578 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict Recurrence-Free Survival After Curative Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study.Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 21;12:849053. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.849053. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35530316 Free PMC article.
-
The prognostic impact of preoperative CA19-9 on resectable cholangiocarcinoma: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Discov Oncol. 2024 Dec 18;15(1):773. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01683-w. Discov Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39692970 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive versus open radical resection surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparable outcomes associated with advantages of minimal invasiveness.PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248534. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33705481 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Four Lymph Node Stage Methods for Predicting the Prognosis of Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Patients After Surgery.Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 3;11:779761. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.779761. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34926292 Free PMC article.
-
Rational Extent of Regional Lymphadenectomy and the Prognostic Impact of the Number of Positive Lymph Nodes for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4306-4317. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13361-2. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36991167
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials