Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb 22;3(3):303-9.

Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens

Bita Behjatnia  1 , Julie Sim, Lawrence W Bassett, Neda A Moatamed, Sophia K Apple
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens

Bita Behjatnia et al. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. .

Abstract

Size of breast cancer is essential in staging cancer to determine type and extent of patient management. This study was conducted to assess accuracy in estimating tumor size by MRI and gross using microscopy as gold standard. A retrospective study was done on 33 patients, 30-75 years, who underwent MRI of breasts with subsequent lumpectomy, 2002-2006, for invasive breast cancer. Size of lesion(s) on MRI and gross were compared with histological size. Of 37 lesions, 27 (73%) were invasive ductal (IDC) and 10 (27%) invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Tumor size by MRI matched histological size in 3%, underestimated 27%, and overestimated 70% of cases. Tumor size by gross matched histological size in 22%, underestimated 57%, and overestimated 22% of cases. MRI as an imaging modality and gross pathology both have significant limitations in measuring tumor size particularly in cases of invasive breast carcinoma. Random sectioning of lumpectomy specimen in invasive breast carcinoma may result in inaccurate staging of tumor by leading to false impression of tumor size and multi-focality and/or multi-centricity of tumor particularly in cases of ILC. Microscopic measurements of tumor size are necessary for accurate T-staging and recommended for appropriate patient management.

Keywords: Breast cancer; MRI; gross pathology; microscopic pathology; tumor size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Serial sectioning of lumpectomy specimen and submission in their entirety.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Firtz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, Marrow M, et al., editors. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual; pp. 221–40.
    1. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. 6th edn. New York: Wiley; 2002. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors.
    1. Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, Thor AD, Allred DC, Clark GM, et al. Prognostic factors in breast cancer: College of American Pathologists consensus statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:966–78. - PubMed
    1. Pritt B, Ashikaga T, Oppenheimer RG, Weaver DL. Influence of breast cancer histology on the relationship between ultrasound and pathology tumor size measurements. Mod Pathol. 2004;17(8):905–10. - PubMed
    1. Apple SK, Suthar F. How do we measure a residual tumor size in istopathology (gold standard) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Breast. 2005;15(3):370–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms