Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 10;5(3):e9530.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009530.

The association between proximity to animal feeding operations and community health: a systematic review

Affiliations

The association between proximity to animal feeding operations and community health: a systematic review

Annette M O'Connor et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: A systematic review was conducted for the association between animal feeding operations (AFOs) and the health of individuals living near AFOs.

Methodology/principal findings: The review was restricted to studies reporting respiratory, gastrointestinal and mental health outcomes in individuals living near AFOs in North America, European Union, United Kingdom, and Scandinavia. From June to September 2008 searches were conducted in PUBMED, CAB, Web-of-Science, and Agricola with no restrictions. Hand searching of narrative reviews was also used. Two reviewers independently evaluated the role of chance, confounding, information, selection and analytic bias on the study outcome. Nine relevant studies were identified. The studies were heterogeneous with respect to outcomes and exposures assessed. Few studies reported an association between surrogate clinical outcomes and AFO proximity. A negative association was reported when odor was the measure of exposure to AFOs and self-reported disease, the measure of outcome. There was evidence of an association between self-reported disease and proximity to AFO in individuals annoyed by AFO odor.

Conclusions/significance: There was inconsistent evidence of a weak association between self-reported disease in people with allergies or familial history of allergies. No consistent dose response relationship between exposure and disease was observable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anon Regulatory Definitions of Large CAFOs, Medium CAFO, and Small CAFOs. a: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2009. Available: http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/home.cfm?program_id=7.
    1. Kirkhorn SR, Garry VF. Agricultural lung diseases. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(Suppl 4):705–712. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donham KJ, Reynolds SJ, Whitten P, Merchant JA, Burmeister L, et al. Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: dose-response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function. Am J Ind Med. 1995;27:405–418. - PubMed
    1. Larsson K, Eklund A, Malmberg P, Belin L. Alterations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid but not in lung function and bronchial responsiveness in swine confinement workers. Chest. 1992;101:767–774. - PubMed
    1. Vogelzang PF, van der Gulden JW, Folgering H, Kolk JJ, Heederik D, et al. Endotoxin exposure as a major determinant of lung function decline in pig farmers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:15–18. - PubMed

Publication types