Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;468(8):2029-38.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1293-9.

A two-stage retention débridement protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infections

Affiliations

A two-stage retention débridement protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infections

Chris S Estes et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Due to the historically poor infection control rates with débridement and component retention for acute periprosthetic infections we developed a new approach for treating acute periprosthetic total joint infections: initial débridement with prosthesis retention and placement of antibiotic-impregnated cement beads followed by a second débridement within 7 days, at which time the beads are removed and new modular parts inserted. Intravenous antibiotics were used for 6 weeks followed by oral antibiotics. Depending on the clinical situation, antibiotics are discontinued or in selected patients continued indefinitely.

Questions/purposes: We determined the ability of this two-stage débridement to control infection.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 20 patients who underwent this technique; 2 had postoperative and 18 had hematogenous infections. The primary outcome measure was the infection control. The minimum followup was 1 year (mean, 3.5 years; range, 1.2-7.5 years).

Results: Two of the 20 patients had persistent infection. There were no failures in the acute postoperative group (0 of 2) and two of 18 in the acute hematogenous group. Of the 18 patients without evidence of persistent infection, 10 were no longer on antibiotics at the most recent followup and eight were treated with long-term antibiotics due to compromised host status.

Conclusions: The control of infection in 18 of 20 patients using this technique compares favorably with historical success rates, which range from 24% to 100%. Further research is required to analyze the individual contribution of débridement technique, the use of serial débridements, local depot antibiotics, and combination antibiotic therapy on short-term infection control rates and the long-term persistent control of periprosthetic infection.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams K, Couch L, Cierny G, Calhoun J, Mader JT. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antibiotic diffusion from antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;278:244–252. - PubMed
    1. Anglen JO. Comparison of soap and antibiotic solutions for irrigation of lower-limb open fracture wounds. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1415–1422. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02615. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burger RR, Basch T, Hopson CN. Implant salvage in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:105–112. - PubMed
    1. Chiu F, Chen C. Surgical debridement and parenteral antibiotics in infected revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:130–135. - PubMed
    1. Cierny G, DiPasquale D. Periprosthetic total joint infections: staging, treatment, and outcomes. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2002;403:23–28. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200210000-00005. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms