Coronary blood flow and perfusion pressure during coronary angiography in patients with ongoing mechanical chest compression: a report on 6 cases
- PMID: 20227005
- DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.02.002
Coronary blood flow and perfusion pressure during coronary angiography in patients with ongoing mechanical chest compression: a report on 6 cases
Abstract
Patients with pulseless electrical activity or refractory ventricular fibrillation have a very bad prognosis. Coronary angiography and angioplasty may be required to restore an effective circulation, but this must be performed whilst chest compressions are continued. The LUCAS chest compression device is suitable for this purpose. So far there are no reports on the effect of this device on coronary circulation in humans. We monitored the coronary perfusion pressure assessed invasively as the difference between the diastolic pressures at the coronary ostium and right atrium, and compared these pressures with coronary flow graded using the TIMI scale in 6 patients. In 4 out of 6 we found a satisfactory coronary artery perfusion pressure and TIMI grade 3 flow (normal) on coronary angiography. Two of these patients survived the first 24h. Two patients did not have a satisfactory perfusion pressure and adequate flow rate was not seen.
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A new device producing manual sternal compression with thoracic constraint for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Resuscitation. 2006 May;69(2):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.07.025. Epub 2006 Feb 2. Resuscitation. 2006. PMID: 16457933
-
Cardiac arrest with continuous mechanical chest compression during percutaneous coronary intervention. A report on the use of the LUCAS device.Resuscitation. 2007 Dec;75(3):454-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.05.007. Epub 2007 Jul 6. Resuscitation. 2007. PMID: 17618034
-
Effects of incomplete chest wall decompression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.Resuscitation. 2005 Mar;64(3):363-72. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.009. Resuscitation. 2005. PMID: 15733767
-
Haemodynamics of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006 Jun;12(3):198-203. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000224861.70958.59. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006. PMID: 16672776 Review.
-
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: state of the art.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1992 Aug;6(4):499-503. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(92)90021-x. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1992. PMID: 1498309 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Complications of mechanical chest compression devices.Neth Heart J. 2014 Sep;22(9):404-7. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0491-y. Neth Heart J. 2014. PMID: 24214460 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Mechanical chest compressions for cardiac arrest in the cath-lab: when is it enough and who should go to extracorporeal cardio pulmonary resuscitation?BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1108-1. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019. PMID: 31159737 Free PMC article.
-
Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium's Advanced Perfusion and Reperfusion Cardiac Life Support Strategy for Out-of-Hospital Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003732. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003732. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27412906 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of hemodynamic effects and resuscitation outcomes between automatic simultaneous sterno-thoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation device and LUCAS in a swine model of cardiac arrest.PLoS One. 2019 Aug 30;14(8):e0221965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221965. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31469891 Free PMC article.
-
Prompt use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the MECCA study report.Singapore Med J. 2017 Jul;58(7):424-431. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017071. Singapore Med J. 2017. PMID: 28741013 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials