Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 May;67(1):22-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.12.020. Epub 2010 Mar 12.

Microfluidic platform versus conventional real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in respiratory specimens

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Microfluidic platform versus conventional real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in respiratory specimens

Elizabeth Wulff-Burchfield et al. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 May.

Abstract

Rapid, accurate diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae is compromised by low sensitivity of culture and serology. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has emerged as a sensitive method to detect M. pneumoniae DNA in clinical specimens. However, conventional real-time PCR is not cost-effective for routine or outpatient implementation. Here, we evaluate a novel microfluidic real-time PCR platform (Advanced Liquid Logic, Research Triangle Park, NC) that is rapid, portable, and fully automated. We enrolled patients with CAP and extracted DNA from nasopharyngeal wash (NPW) specimens using a biotinylated capture probe and streptavidin-coupled magnetic beads. Each extract was tested for M. pneumoniae-specific DNA by real-time PCR on both conventional and microfluidic platforms using Taqman probe and primers. Three of 59 (5.0%) NPWs were positive, and agreement between the methods was 98%. The microfluidic platform was equally sensitive but 3 times faster and offers an inexpensive and convenient diagnostic test for microbial DNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Microfluidic PCR setup. Left: The self contained instrument including power supply, control electronics, fluorimeter module, heaters and cartridge deck, which is shown with the cartridge loaded (arrow). Center: Photograph of assembled microfluidic cartridge comprising an 86 × 86 mm PCB chip, polymer spacer/gasket and glass top-plate with drilled holes. Right: Schematic of PCR chip showing electrode positions relative to heaters, magnets and detectors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Limit of detection and precision testing performed with simulated clinical samples on (A) the conventional real-time PCR platform and (B) the microfluidic real-time PCR platform. Concentration versus mean CT with standard deviations shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Auroux PA, Koc Y, deMello A, Manz A, Day PJ. Miniaturised nucleic acid analysis. Lab Chip. 2004;4:534–546. - PubMed
    1. Beersma MFC, Dirven K, van Dam AP, Templeton KE, Claas ECJ, Goossens H. Evaluation of 12 commercial tests and the complement fixation test for Mycoplasma pneumoniae-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies, with PCR used as the “gold standard”. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:2277–2285. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernet C, Garret M, de Barbeyrac B, Bébéar CM, Bonnet J. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:2492–2496. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen L, Manz A, Day PJ. Total nucleic acid analysis integrated on microfluidic devices. Lab Chip. 2007;7:1413–1423. - PubMed
    1. Cler L, Bu D, Lewis C, Euhus D. A comparison of five methods for extracting DNA from paucicellular clinical samples. Mol Cell Probes. 2006;20:191–196. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms