Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;81(4):316-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Jan 27.

Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy

Elizabeth Miller  1 , Michele R Decker, Heather L McCauley, Daniel J Tancredi, Rebecca R Levenson, Jeffrey Waldman, Phyllis Schoenwald, Jay G Silverman
Affiliations

Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy

Elizabeth Miller et al. Contraception. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Reproductive control including pregnancy coercion (coercion by male partners to become pregnant) and birth control sabotage (partner interference with contraception) may be associated with partner violence and risk for unintended pregnancy among young adult females utilizing family planning clinic services.

Study design: A cross-sectional survey was administered to females ages 16-29 years seeking care in five family planning clinics in Northern California (N=1278).

Results: Fifty-three percent of respondents reported physical or sexual partner violence, 19% reported experiencing pregnancy coercion and 15% reported birth control sabotage. One third of respondents reporting partner violence (35%) also reported reproductive control. Both pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage were associated with unintended pregnancy (AOR 1.83, 95% CI 1.36-2.46, and AOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.20, respectively). In analyses stratified by partner violence exposure, associations of reproductive control with unintended pregnancy persisted only among women with a history of partner violence.

Conclusions: Pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage are common among young women utilizing family planning clinics, and in the context of partner violence, are associated with increased risk for unintended pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
Overlap of lifetime physical or sexual partner violence victimization, pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage among female clients seeking family planning services Intimate partner violence (IPV) history reported N (% total sample) = 683 (53.4%) No IPV history reported N (% total sample) = 595 (46.6%) PC = pregnancy control BCS = birth control sabotage
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Black MC, Breiding MJ. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008. [accessed December 1, 2009]. Adverse health conditions and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence - United States, 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5705a1.htm. - PubMed
    1. Silverman JG, Raj A, Mucci LA, Hathaway JE. Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. JAMA. 2001;286:572–579. - PubMed
    1. Hamberger LK, Ambuel B. Dating violence. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1998;45:381–390. - PubMed
    1. Howard D, Wang M, Yan F. Psychosocial factors associated with reports of physical dating violence among U.S. adolescent females. Adolescence. 2007;42:311–324. - PubMed
    1. Catalano S. Intimate partner violence in the United States. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2007.

Publication types