Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 May;38(5):1270-5.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8a217.

"It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

"It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis

Elizabeth A Boyd et al. Crit Care Med. 2010 May.

Abstract

Objective: Physicians and surrogate decision-makers for seriously ill patients often have different views of patients' prognoses. We sought to understand what sources of knowledge surrogates rely on when estimating a patient's prognosis.

Design: Prospective, mixed-methods study using face-to-face, semistructured interviews with surrogate decision-makers.

Setting: Four intensive care units at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center in 2006 to 2007.

Participants: Participants were 179 surrogate decision-makers for 142 incapacitated, critically ill patients at high risk for death.

Main results: Less than 2% (3 of 179) of surrogates reported that their beliefs about the patients' prognoses hinged exclusively on prognostic information provided to them by physicians. The majority cited other factors in addition to physicians' predictions that also contributed to their beliefs about the patients' prognoses, including perceptions of the patient's individual strength of character and will to live; the patient's unique history of illness and survival; the surrogate's own observations of the patient's physical appearance; the surrogate's belief that their presence at the bedside may improve the prognosis; and the surrogate's optimism, intuition, and faith. For some surrogates, these other sources of knowledge superseded the importance of the physician's prognostication. However, most surrogates endeavored to balance their own knowledge of the patient with physicians' biomedical knowledge.

Conclusions: Surrogates use diverse types of knowledge when estimating their loved ones' prognoses, including individualized attributes of the patient, such as their strength of character and life history, of which physicians may be unaware. Attention to these considerations may help clinicians identify and overcome disagreements about prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have not disclosed any potential conflicts of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1163–1167. - PubMed
    1. LeClaire MM, Oakes JM, Weinert CR. Communication of prognostic information for critically ill patients. Chest. 2005;128:1728–1735. - PubMed
    1. Cherlin E, Fried T, Prigerson HG, et al. Communication between physicians and family caregivers about care at the end of life: When do discussions occur and what is said? J Palliative Med. 2005;8:1176–1185. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heyland DK, Tranmer J, O’Callaghan CJ, et al. The seriously ill hospitalized patient: Preferred role in end of life decision-making? J Crit Care. 2003;18:3–10. - PubMed
    1. Hanson LM, Danis M, Garrett J. What is wrong with end-of-life care? Opinions of bereaved family members. J Am Geriatric Society. 1997;45:1339–1344. - PubMed

Publication types