"It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis
- PMID: 20228686
- PMCID: PMC3530838
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8a217
"It's not just what the doctor tells me:" factors that influence surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of prognosis
Abstract
Objective: Physicians and surrogate decision-makers for seriously ill patients often have different views of patients' prognoses. We sought to understand what sources of knowledge surrogates rely on when estimating a patient's prognosis.
Design: Prospective, mixed-methods study using face-to-face, semistructured interviews with surrogate decision-makers.
Setting: Four intensive care units at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center in 2006 to 2007.
Participants: Participants were 179 surrogate decision-makers for 142 incapacitated, critically ill patients at high risk for death.
Main results: Less than 2% (3 of 179) of surrogates reported that their beliefs about the patients' prognoses hinged exclusively on prognostic information provided to them by physicians. The majority cited other factors in addition to physicians' predictions that also contributed to their beliefs about the patients' prognoses, including perceptions of the patient's individual strength of character and will to live; the patient's unique history of illness and survival; the surrogate's own observations of the patient's physical appearance; the surrogate's belief that their presence at the bedside may improve the prognosis; and the surrogate's optimism, intuition, and faith. For some surrogates, these other sources of knowledge superseded the importance of the physician's prognostication. However, most surrogates endeavored to balance their own knowledge of the patient with physicians' biomedical knowledge.
Conclusions: Surrogates use diverse types of knowledge when estimating their loved ones' prognoses, including individualized attributes of the patient, such as their strength of character and life history, of which physicians may be unaware. Attention to these considerations may help clinicians identify and overcome disagreements about prognosis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have not disclosed any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Do you see what I see? Families, physicians, and prognostic dissonance in the intensive care unit.Crit Care Med. 2010 May;38(5):1381-2. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181da4652. Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20404633 No abstract available.
References
-
- Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1163–1167. - PubMed
-
- LeClaire MM, Oakes JM, Weinert CR. Communication of prognostic information for critically ill patients. Chest. 2005;128:1728–1735. - PubMed
-
- Heyland DK, Tranmer J, O’Callaghan CJ, et al. The seriously ill hospitalized patient: Preferred role in end of life decision-making? J Crit Care. 2003;18:3–10. - PubMed
-
- Hanson LM, Danis M, Garrett J. What is wrong with end-of-life care? Opinions of bereaved family members. J Am Geriatric Society. 1997;45:1339–1344. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical