Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Apr 1;35(7):803-11.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bc9454.

Variation in eligibility criteria from studies of radiculopathy due to a herniated disc and of neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis: a structured literature review

Affiliations
Review

Variation in eligibility criteria from studies of radiculopathy due to a herniated disc and of neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis: a structured literature review

Stephane Genevay et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: A structured literature review.

Summary of the background data: Widely recognized classification criteria for rheumatologic disorders have resulted in well-defined patient populations for clinical investigation.

Objective: We sought to determine whether similar criteria were needed for back pain disorders by examining variability in eligibility criteria in published studies.

Methods: Studies involving radiculopathy due to lumbar herniated disc (HD) and for neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were identified. Randomized controlled trials published between January 1, 2006 and October 1, 2008 in select peer reviewed journals were retrieved, their eligibility criteria were identified and categorized.

Results: Twelve eligible HD studies were identified. Thirteen unique categories of eligibility criteria were identified with a mean of 3.9 (+/-2.0) and a range from 0 to 8 categories per study. More categories were present for studies that included nonsurgical (5.6 +/- 2.5) treatment for studies with only surgical treatment (2.6 +/- 1.7) P = 0.04). Seven LSS studies met eligibility criteria, and 9 unique categories were identified. A mean of 5.0 (+/-2.2) categories with a range from 2 to 7 was used per study.

Conclusion: Wide variation in the number and type of eligibility criteria from randomized clinical trials of well defined back pain syndromes was identified. These results support the need for developing and disseminating international classification criteria for these clinical conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brosseau L, Milne S, Robinson V, et al. Efficacy of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis. Spine. 2002;27:596–603. - PubMed
    1. Koes BW, Bouter LM, van der Heijden GJ. Methodological quality of randomized clinical trials on treatment efficacy in low back pain. Spine. 1995;20:228–35. - PubMed
    1. Niemisto L, Kalso E, Malmivaara A, et al. Radiofrequency denervation for neck and back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine. 2003;28:1877–88. - PubMed
    1. van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, Berman B, et al. The effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of acute and chronic low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine. 1999;24:1113–23. - PubMed
    1. Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, et al. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ. 2005;330:1233. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms