Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;38(6):815-27.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9.

Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: the role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure

Affiliations

Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: the role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure

Tiziana Pozzoli et al. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

This study examined the role of pro-victim attitudes, personal responsibility, coping responses to observations of bullying, and perceived peer normative pressure in explaining defending the victim and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. A total of 462 Italian early adolescents (mean age = 13.4 years, SD = 9 months) participated in the study. The behaviors were measured through two informants: each individual student and the teachers. The findings of a series of hierarchical regressions showed that, regardless of the informant, problem solving coping strategies and perceived peer normative pressure for intervention were positively associated with active help towards a bullied peer and negatively related to passivity. In contrast, distancing strategies were positively associated with passive bystanding, whereas they were negatively associated with teacher-reported defending behavior. Moreover, self-reported defending behavior was positively associated with personal responsibility for intervention, but only under conditions of low perceived peer pressure. Finally, the perception of peer pressure for intervention buffered the negative influence of distancing on passive bystanding tendencies. Future directions are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Child Dev. 1996 Oct;67(5):2317-27 - PubMed
    1. J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Sep;44(9):492-7 - PubMed
    1. J Adolesc Health. 1998 Sep;23(3):167-80 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Psychol. 2003 Dec;44(5):479-88 - PubMed
    1. J Adolesc. 2008 Feb;31(1):93-105 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources