Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 May;14(5):788-804.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1168-0. Epub 2010 Mar 13.

Effect of preoperative single-dose corticosteroid administration on postoperative morbidity following esophagectomy

Affiliations
Review

Effect of preoperative single-dose corticosteroid administration on postoperative morbidity following esophagectomy

Edgard Engelman et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 May.

Abstract

Background: Eight clinical trials involving the administration of preoperative i.v. methylprednisolone have been undertaken in order to decrease the considerable inflammatory response to esophageal resection, in an effort to decrease the supposedly associated morbidity and mortality

Method: A meta-analysis was performed for eight clinical end-points. Due to quality problems in seven of the eight included studies, a Bayesian meta-analysis using a skeptical prior derived from the results of the classical analysis was also performed.

Results: The end-points including any organ dysfunction (OR = 0.30), respiratory complication (OR = 0.41), sepsis (OR = 0.37), liver dysfunction (OR = 18), cardiovascular dysfunction (OR = 0.28), and surgical anastomotic leak (OR = 0.42) were significantly decreased by methylprednisolone pretreatment. Following the Bayesian analysis, despite the use of skeptical priors, there is a 95% probability to obtain a relative risk reduction of at least 23% to 54%, depending of the end-point, by methylprednisolone pretreatment.

Conclusion: We are in the presence of a potential benefit that cannot be accepted at face value due to the quality problems of the included studies. But in the presence of a remaining potential benefit after a Bayesian analysis starting from a skeptical prior, the best option would be the planning of a large multicenter prospective randomized study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2004 Feb;30(1):63-9 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):269-78 - PubMed
    1. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Jul-Aug;51(58):994-7 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar;202(3):439-44 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Surg. 1997 Jul;163(7):511-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources