Community members as recruiters of human subjects: ethical considerations
- PMID: 20229402
- PMCID: PMC3139466
- DOI: 10.1080/15265160903585578
Community members as recruiters of human subjects: ethical considerations
Abstract
Few studies have considered in detail the ethical issues surrounding research in which investigators ask community members to engage in research subject recruitment within their own communities. Peer-driven recruitment (PDR) and its variants are useful for accessing and including certain populations in research, but also have the potential to undermine the ethical and scientific integrity of community-based research. This paper examines the ethical implications of utilizing community members as recruiters of human subjects in the context of PDR, as well as the authors' experience with a variant of PDR in a research project in South Africa. The importance of situating PDR in a comprehensive community engagement process that is responsive to the constraints of science and local needs and interests is emphasized. The paper will have relevance to bioethicists, health researchers, and research regulators concerned about the appropriate use of peer-driven recruitment strategies in health research.
Comment in
-
Response to open peer commentaries on "Community members as recruiters of human subjects: ethical considerations".Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):W1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161003708508. Am J Bioeth. 2010. PMID: 20229401 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Examining the potential for exploitation by local intermediaries.Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):12-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160903585586. Am J Bioeth. 2010. PMID: 20229405 No abstract available.
-
Protecting the subject: PDR and the potential for compromised consent.Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):14-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160903585602. Am J Bioeth. 2010. PMID: 20229406 No abstract available.
-
Ethical implications of peer-driven recruitment: guidelines from public health research.Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):16-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160903585610. Am J Bioeth. 2010. PMID: 20229407 No abstract available.
-
Betwixt & between: peer recruiter proximity in community-based research.Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):18-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160903581783. Am J Bioeth. 2010. PMID: 20229408 No abstract available.
-
The role of community-based organizations in the recruitment of human subjects: ethical considerations.Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):20-1. doi: 10.1080/15265161003599667. Am J Bioeth. 2010. PMID: 20229409 No abstract available.
-
Disentangling methodologies: the ethics of traditional sampling methodologies, community-based participatory research, and respondent-driven sampling.Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):22-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160903585628. Am J Bioeth. 2010. PMID: 20229410 No abstract available.
-
Community members employed on research projects face crucial, often under-recognized, ethical dilemmas.Am J Bioeth. 2010 Mar;10(3):24-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161003708623. Am J Bioeth. 2010. PMID: 20229411 No abstract available.
References
-
- Atkinson R, Flint J. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update. 2001;33:1–4.
-
- Bailie RS, Selvey CE, Bourne D, Bradshaw D. Trends in cervical cancer mortality in South Africa. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1996;25(3):488–493. - PubMed
-
- Bianchi A, Bishara D, Enekwe P, Frost B, Kastning A, Tiffany J. Friends inviting friends: Participant-driven recruitment in an HIV prevention research project. Community Youth Development Journal. 2003;4(1):26–31.
-
- Borfitz D. India becoming favored destination for clinical trials. BiolTWorld. 2008 Available at: http://www.bio-itworld.com/newsitems/2008/jan/22-clinical-trials-india.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources