Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;25(1):168-76.
doi: 10.1037/a0018127.

Pay now or pay later: aging and the role of boundary salience in self-regulation of conceptual integration in sentence processing

Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow  1 , Matthew C Shake, Joseph R Miles, Kenton Lee, Xuefei Gao, George McConkie
Affiliations

Pay now or pay later: aging and the role of boundary salience in self-regulation of conceptual integration in sentence processing

Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow et al. Psychol Aging. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that older readers may self-regulate input during reading differently from the way younger readers do, so as to accommodate age-graded change in processing capacity. For example, older adults may pause more frequently for conceptual integration. Presumably, such an allocation policy would enable older readers to manage the cognitive demands of constructing a semantic representation of the text by off-loading the products of intermediate computations to long-term memory, thus decreasing memory demands as conceptual load increases. This was explicitly tested in 2 experiments measuring word-by-word reading time for sentences in which boundary salience was manipulated but in which semantic content was controlled. With both a computer-based moving-window paradigm that permits only forward eye movements, and an eye-tracking paradigm that allows measurement of regressive eye movements, we found evidence for the proposed tradeoff between early and late wrap-up. Across the 2 experiments, age groups were more similar than different in regulating processing time. However, older adults showed evidence of exaggerated early wrap-up in both experiments. These data are consistent with the notion that readers opportunistically regulate effort and that older readers can use this to good advantage to maintain comprehension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Word reading time (ms) as a function of location in the passage and boundary marking. The left panel shows wrap up at early boundary site (i.e., longer times at T1 than non-boundary (NB)). The right panel shows trade-off in processing time between earlier boundary sites (T1) and later boundary sites (T2) as a function of marking.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regression path durations (ms) as a function of location in the passage and boundary salience for younger (upper) and older (lower) readers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The probability of T1 being a launch site (left panel) and a landing site (right panel) as a function of age and boundary salience.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Aaronson D, Scarborough HS. Performance theories for sentence coding: Some qualitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1976;2:56–70.
    1. Burke DM, Shafto MA. Language and aging. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, editors. Handbook of Aging and Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2008. pp. 373–443.
    1. Christianson K, Hollingsworth A, Halliwell J, Ferreira F. Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology. 2001;42:368–407. - PubMed
    1. Chute DL, Westall RF, Barisa JJ. Power laboratory. Devon, PA: MacLaboratory, Inc; 1996.
    1. Cohen G, Faulkner D. Memory for text: Some age differences in nature of information that is retained after listening to texts. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG, editors. Attention and performance X. Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbaum; 1984. pp. 501–514.

Publication types