Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age
- PMID: 20230138
- DOI: 10.1037/a0017122
Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age
Abstract
Does advancing age reduce the ability to bypass the central bottleneck through task automatization? To answer this question, the authors asked 12 older adults and 20 young adults to first learn to perform an auditory-vocal task (low vs. high pitch) in 6 single-task sessions. Their dual-task performance was then assessed with a psychological refractory period paradigm, in which the highly practiced auditory-vocal task was presented as Task 2, along with an unpracticed visual-manual Task 1. Converging evidence indicated qualitative differences in dual-task performance with age: Whereas the vast majority of young adults bypassed the bottleneck, at most 1 of the 12 older adults was able to do so. Older adults are either reluctant to bypass the bottleneck (as a matter of strategy) or have lost the ability to automatize task performance.
Similar articles
-
Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.Mem Cognit. 2008 Oct;36(7):1262-82. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1262. Mem Cognit. 2008. PMID: 18927042
-
Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?Psychol Aging. 2004 Dec;19(4):649-67. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.649. Psychol Aging. 2004. PMID: 15584790
-
Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.Psychol Aging. 2006 Sep;21(3):431-47. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.431. Psychol Aging. 2006. PMID: 16953708
-
Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):212-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03196277. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002. PMID: 12120784 Review.
-
Can automaticity be verified utilizing a perceptual load manipulation?Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2037-2046. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1444-7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018. PMID: 29423573 Review.
Cited by
-
Qualitative attentional changes with age in doing two tasks at once.Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):54-61. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0881-9. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 26106060
-
Response Time Reduction Due to Retesting in Mental Speed Tests: A Meta-Analysis.J Intell. 2018 Feb 26;6(1):6. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6010006. J Intell. 2018. PMID: 31162433 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dual-Task Effects on Performance of Gait and Balance in People with Knee Pain: A Systematic Scoping Review.J Clin Med. 2020 May 21;9(5):1554. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051554. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32455597 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-tasking costs in triple-task performance despite dual-task preparation.Mem Cognit. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01674-w. Online ahead of print. Mem Cognit. 2025. PMID: 39875715
-
Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.Exp Aging Res. 2016;42(3):221-63. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2016.1156964. Exp Aging Res. 2016. PMID: 27070044 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical