Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Mar;22(1):96-107.
doi: 10.1037/a0017240.

Multimethod assessment of psychopathy in relation to factors of internalizing and externalizing from the Personality Assessment Inventory: the impact of method variance and suppressor effects

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Multimethod assessment of psychopathy in relation to factors of internalizing and externalizing from the Personality Assessment Inventory: the impact of method variance and suppressor effects

Daniel M Blonigen et al. Psychol Assess. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Research to date has revealed divergent relations across factors of psychopathy measures with criteria of internalizing (INT; anxiety, depression) and externalizing (EXT; antisocial behavior, substance use). However, failure to account for method variance and suppressor effects has obscured the consistency of these findings across distinct measures of psychopathy. Using a large correctional sample, the current study employed a multimethod approach to psychopathy assessment (self-report, interview and file review) to explore convergent and discriminant relations between factors of psychopathy measures and latent criteria of INT and EXT derived from the Personality Assessment Inventory (Morey, 2007). Consistent with prediction, scores on the affective-interpersonal factor of psychopathy were negatively associated with INT and negligibly related to EXT, whereas scores on the social deviance factor exhibited positive associations (moderate and large, respectively) with both INT and EXT. Notably, associations were highly comparable across the psychopathy measures when accounting for method variance (in the case of EXT) and when assessing for suppressor effects (in the case of INT). Findings are discussed in terms of implications for clinical assessment and evaluation of the validity of interpretations drawn from scores on psychopathy measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurement Model of PAI-based Internalizing and Externalizing. ANX = Anxiety, ARD = Anxiety-Related Disorders, DEP = Depression, ANT = Antisocial Features, AGG = Aggression, ALC = Alcohol Problems, DRG = Drug Problems. ** p < .01, * p < .05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS. Psychopathology of childhood. Annual Review of Psychology. 1984;35:227–256. - PubMed
    1. Ammons RB, Ammons CH. The Quick Test (QT): Provisional manual. Psychological Reports. 1962;11:111–161.
    1. Andershed H, Kerr M, Stattin H, Levander S. Psychopathic traits in non-referred youths: Initial test of a new assessment tool. In: Blaauw E, Sheridan L, editors. Psychopaths: Current international perspectives. The Hague: Elsevier; 2002. pp. 131–158.
    1. Benning SD, Patrick CJ, Blonigen DM, Hicks BM, Iacono WG. Estimating facets of psychopathy from normal personality traits: A step toward community-epidemiological investigations. Assessment. 2005a;12:3–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benning SD, Patrick CJ, Hicks BM, Blonigen DM, Krueger RF. Factor structure of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory: Validity and implications for clinical assessment. Psychological Assessment. 2003;15:340–350. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms