State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: III. Intrauterine devices
- PMID: 20230337
- DOI: 10.3109/13625180903519885
State-of-the-art of non-hormonal methods of contraception: III. Intrauterine devices
Abstract
Since the 1959 revival of the IUD, non-hormonal devices have become the most widely used of all reversible contraceptives. Pregnancy rates of copper-releasing IUDs in current use range from approximately 0.5 to 1.5 per hundred continuing users in the first year, with somewhat lower annual pregnancy rates thereafter. Evidence-based research has been systematically conducted and translated into guidelines for eligibility criteria and problem management. Recent device research, beyond the T, Multiload and frameless devices has centred on improved designs such as U ,Y and Slimline shapes, or enhanced copper release, the latter through electrochemical effects or nanotechnology applications. Other IUD research foci concern devices that decrease bleeding and pain by releasing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Yet other research lines indicate noncontraceptive benefits of copper intrauterine devices in protecting against endometrial cancer, and favourable risk-benefit analyses of IUD use by women at risk of or post HIV infection. IUD mechanisms of action and the relation of IUDs to pelvic infection and ectopic pregnancy are briefly reviewed. For our literature search we used Medline, Popline and Cochrane Library data bases, Google search, our personal files, and the references contained in articles in our files.
Similar articles
-
Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.Prescrire Int. 2009 Jun;18(101):125-30. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 19637436
-
Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs).IPPF Med Bull. 1987 Dec;21(6):3-5. IPPF Med Bull. 1987. PMID: 12268853
-
[IUDs and ectopic pregnancy].Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1983 Dec;11(12):1287-94. Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1983. PMID: 12312723 French.
-
The intrauterine device in the present and future.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec;5(6):829-32. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8286697 Review.
-
Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?J Reprod Med. 1999 Mar;44(3):269-74. J Reprod Med. 1999. PMID: 10202746 Review.
Cited by
-
Strategies for improving the acceptability and acceptance of the copper intrauterine device.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD008896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008896.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22419340 Free PMC article.
-
Studies of acute and subchronic systemic toxicity associated with a copper/low-density polyethylene nanocomposite intrauterine device.Int J Nanomedicine. 2018 Aug 31;13:4913-4926. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S169114. eCollection 2018. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018. PMID: 30214197 Free PMC article.
-
Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives.Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Mar 16;7:19-32. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546. eCollection 2016. Open Access J Contracept. 2016. PMID: 29386934 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017 Jun;39(6):294-308. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603647. Epub 2017 Jul 3. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017. PMID: 28672413 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Coexpression Analysis of Transcriptome on AIDS and Other Human Disease Pathways by Canonical Correlation Analysis.Int J Genomics. 2017;2017:9163719. doi: 10.1155/2017/9163719. Epub 2017 Jun 14. Int J Genomics. 2017. PMID: 28695125 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources