Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2010 Mar 15;24(6):517-20.
doi: 10.1101/gad.1914210.

{Delta}Np73{beta} puts the brakes on DNA repair

Affiliations
Comment

{Delta}Np73{beta} puts the brakes on DNA repair

Emma Vernersson-Lindahl et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

Mammalian cells are barraged with endogenous metabolic byproducts and environmental insults that can lead to nearly a million genomic lesions per cell per day. Networks of proteins that repair these lesions are essential for genome maintenance, and a compromise in these pathways propagates mutations that can cause aging and cancer. The p53 tumor suppressor plays a central role in repairing the effects of DNA damage, and has therefore earned the title of "guardian of the genome." In this issue of Genes & Development, Wilhelm and colleagues (pp. 549-560) demonstrate that p73-an older sibling of p53-inhibits pathways that resolve DNA double-strand breaks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Model for the role of ΔNp73β in the DDR. The data presented by Wilhelm et al. (2010) support a model in which ΔNp73β inhibits ATM–p53 signaling. (Left) In normal cells, ΔNp73β interacts with 53BP1, and p53 activity is kept in check via MDM2-mediated degradation. (Right) In response to dsDNA breaks triggered by DNA damage, the ΔNp73β:53BP1 complex is recruited to sites of DNA damage, ATM is activated, and MDM2’s inhibitory effect on p53 is alleviated; in the absence of ΔNp73, this pathway is enhanced. Although p73 is localized to DNA damage-induced foci under physiological conditions, this association is clearly not needed for 53BP1 localization, as 53BP1 localizes to sites of DNA damage even in the absence of ΔNp73.

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buhlmann S, Putzer BM. DNp73 a matter of cancer: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1785:207–216. - PubMed
    1. Casciano I, Mazzocco K, Boni L, Pagnan G, Banelli B, Allemanni G, Ponzoni M, Tonini GP, Romani M. Expression of ΔNp73 is a molecular marker for adverse outcome in neuroblastoma patients. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9:246–251. - PubMed
    1. Collado M, Serrano M. The power and the promise of oncogene-induced senescence markers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:472–476. - PubMed
    1. Derbyshire DJ, Basu BP, Serpell LC, Joo WS, Date T, Iwabuchi K, Doherty AJ. Crystal structure of human 53BP1 BRCT domains bound to p53 tumour suppressor. EMBO J. 2002;21:3863–3872. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeYoung MP, Johannessen CM, Leong CO, Faquin W, Rocco JW, Ellisen LW. Tumor-specific p73 up-regulation mediates p63 dependence in squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2006;66:9362–9368. - PubMed

MeSH terms