The impact of partial biopsy on histopathologic diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: experience of an Australian tertiary referral service
- PMID: 20231492
- DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.14
The impact of partial biopsy on histopathologic diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: experience of an Australian tertiary referral service
Abstract
Objective: To compare partial and excisional biopsy techniques in the accuracy of histopathologic diagnosis and microstaging of cutaneous melanoma.
Design: Prospective case series.
Setting: Tertiary referral, ambulatory care, institutional practice. Patients Consecutive cases from 1995 to 2006. Interventions Partial and excisional biopsy. Other factors considered were anatomic site, physician type at initial management, hypomelanosis, melanoma subtype, biopsy sample size, multiple biopsies, and tumor thickness.
Main outcome measures: Histopathologic diagnosis (false-negative misdiagnosis-overall or with an adverse outcome-and false-positive misdiagnosis) and microstaging accuracy. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained from multinomial logistic regression.
Results: Increased odds of histopathologic misdiagnosis were associated with punch biopsy (OR, 16.6; 95% CI, 10-27) (P < .001) and shave biopsy (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.7) (P = .02) compared with excisional biopsy. Punch biopsy was associated with increased odds of misdiagnosis with an adverse outcome (OR, 20; 95% CI, 10-41) (P < .001). Other factors associated with increased odds of misdiagnosis included acral lentiginous melanoma (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 2-13) (P < .001), desmoplastic melanoma (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.1-13.0) (P = .03), and nevoid melanoma (OR, 28.4; 95% CI, 7-115) (P < .001). Punch biopsy (OR, 5.1; 95% CI, 3.4-7.6) (P < .001) and shave biopsy (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.6) (P < .001) had increased odds of microstaging inaccuracy over excisional biopsy. Tumor thickness was the most important determinant of microstaging inaccuracy when partial biopsy was used (odds of significant microstaging inaccuracy increased 1.8-fold for every 1 mm increase in tumor thickness; 95% CI, 1.4-2.4) (P < .001).
Conclusions: Among melanoma seen at a tertiary referral center, histopathologic misdiagnosis is more common for melanomas that have been assessed with punch and shave biopsy than with excisional biopsy. Regardless of biopsy method, adverse outcomes due to misdiagnosis may occur. However, such adverse events are more commonly associated with punch biopsy than with shave and excisional biopsy. The use of punch and shave biopsy also leads to increased microstaging inaccuracy.
Comment in
-
Dermatologists, general practitioners, and the best method to biopsy suspect melanocytic neoplasms.Arch Dermatol. 2010 Mar;146(3):325-8. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2010.15. Arch Dermatol. 2010. PMID: 20231507 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Method of biopsy and incidence of positive margins in primary melanoma.Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):893-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9240-4. Epub 2006 Nov 21. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17119869
-
Effect of biopsy type on outcomes in the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma.Am J Surg. 2013 May;205(5):585-90; discussion 590. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.023. Am J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23592167
-
Accuracy of partial biopsies in the management of cutaneous melanoma.Australas J Dermatol. 2019 Aug;60(3):209-213. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13004. Epub 2019 Feb 17. Australas J Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 30773625
-
Cutaneous malignant melanoma: a primary care perspective.Am Fam Physician. 2012 Jan 15;85(2):161-8. Am Fam Physician. 2012. PMID: 22335216 Review.
-
The most common challenges in melanoma diagnosis and how to avoid them.Australas J Dermatol. 2009 Feb;50(1):1-13; quiz 14-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2008.00496_1.x. Australas J Dermatol. 2009. PMID: 19178485 Review.
Cited by
-
Choosing to biopsy or refer suspicious melanocytic lesions in general practice.BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Aug 8;13:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-78. BMC Fam Pract. 2012. PMID: 22873705 Free PMC article.
-
Handheld photoacoustic probe to detect both melanoma depth and volume at high speed in vivo.J Biophotonics. 2015 Nov;8(11-12):961-967. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201400143. Epub 2015 Feb 9. J Biophotonics. 2015. PMID: 25676898 Free PMC article.
-
Desmoplastic melanoma: a review.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 May;68(5):825-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.041. Epub 2012 Dec 23. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23267722 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Delphi Consensus Among International Experts on the Diagnosis, Management, and Surveillance for Lentigo Maligna.Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023 Jul 1;13(3):e2023244. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1303a244. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023. PMID: 37403983 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Biopsy Technique on Clinically Important Outcomes for Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jul 15;4(4):373-383. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.04.005. eCollection 2020 Aug. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32793865 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical