Does slice thickness affect diagnostic performance of 64-slice CT coronary angiography in stable and unstable angina patients with a positive calcium score?
- PMID: 20233143
- DOI: 10.3109/02841851003649274
Does slice thickness affect diagnostic performance of 64-slice CT coronary angiography in stable and unstable angina patients with a positive calcium score?
Abstract
Background: Coronary calcification can lead to over-estimation of the degree of coronary stenosis.
Purpose: To evaluate whether thinner reconstruction thickness improves the diagnostic performance of 64-slice CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in angina patients with a positive calcium score.
Material and methods: We selected 20 scans from a clinical study comparing CTCA to conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in stable and unstable angina patients based on a low number of motion artifacts and a positive calcium score. All images were acquired at 64 x 0.625 mm and each CTCA scan was reconstructed at slice thickness/increment 0.67 mm/0.33 mm, 0.9 mm/0.45 mm, and 1.4 mm/0.7 mm. Two reviewers blinded for CCA results independently evaluated the scans for the presence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in three randomly composed series, with > or =2 weeks in between series. The diagnostic performance of CTCA was compared for the different slice thicknesses using a pooled analysis of both reviewers. Significant CAD was defined as >50% diameter narrowing on quantitative CCA. Image noise (standard deviation of CT numbers) was measured in all scans. Inter-observer variability was assessed with kappa.
Results: Significant CAD was present in 8% of 304 available segments. Median total Agatston calcium score was 181.8 (interquartile range 34.9-815.6). Sensitivity at 0.67 mm, 0.9 mm, and 1.4 mm slice thickness was 70% (95% confidence interval 57-83%), 74% (62-86%), and 70% (57-83%), respectively. Specificity was 85% (82-88%), 84% (81-87%), and 84% (81-87%), respectively. The positive predictive value was 30 (21-38%), 29 (21-37%), and 28 (20-36%), respectively. The negative predictive value was 97% (95-98%), 97% (96-99%), and 97% (96-99%), respectively. Kappa for inter-observer agreement was 0.56, 0.58, and 0.59. Noise decreased from 32.9 HU at 0.67 mm, to 23.2 HU at 1.4 mm (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Diagnostic performance of CTCA in angina patients with a positive calcium score was not markedly affected by modest variations in reconstruction slice thickness.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: The effect of average heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcium score in a clinical perspective.Acta Radiol. 2010 Sep;51(7):727-40. doi: 10.3109/02841851.2010.492792. Acta Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20707657
-
Is there a role for CT coronary angiography in patients with symptomatic angina? Effect of coronary calcium score on identification of stenosis.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Dec;25(8):847-54. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9485-7. Epub 2009 Aug 1. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009. PMID: 19649721 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective and retrospective ECG-gating for CT coronary angiography perform similarly accurate at low heart rates.Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jul;79(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.016. Epub 2010 Jan 15. Eur J Radiol. 2011. PMID: 20079993
-
[Noninvasive computed tomographic coronary angiography as a complement to coronary calcium quantification in symptomatic patients].Herz. 2003 Mar;28(2):106-18. doi: 10.1007/s00059-003-2452-5. Herz. 2003. PMID: 12669224 Review. German.
-
A practical guide to reading CT coronary angiograms--how to avoid mistakes when assessing for coronary stenoses.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007 Oct;23(5):617-33. doi: 10.1007/s10554-006-9173-9. Epub 2006 Dec 21. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007. PMID: 17186138 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous