Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Mar 16:340:c1035.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1035.

Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life

Ludeke C Lambeek  1 , Willem van Mechelen, Dirk L Knol, Patrick Loisel, Johannes R Anema
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life

Ludeke C Lambeek et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated care programme, combining a patient directed and a workplace directed intervention, for patients with chronic low back pain.

Design: Population based randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Primary care (10 physiotherapy practices, one occupational health service, one occupational therapy practice) and secondary care (five hospitals).

Participants: 134 adults aged 18-65 sick listed for at least 12 weeks owing to low back pain.

Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to usual care (n=68) or integrated care (n=66). Integrated care consisted of a workplace intervention based on participatory ergonomics, involving a supervisor, and a graded activity programme based on cognitive behavioural principles.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the duration of time off work (work disability) due to low back pain until full sustainable return to work. Secondary outcome measures were intensity of pain and functional status.

Results: The median duration until sustainable return to work was 88 days in the integrated care group compared with 208 days in the usual care group (P=0.003). Integrated care was effective on return to work (hazard ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.8, P=0.004). After 12 months, patients in the integrated care group improved significantly more on functional status compared with patients in the usual care group (P=0.01). Improvement of pain between the groups did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: The integrated care programme substantially reduced disability due to chronic low back pain in private and working life. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN28478651.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Patient flow through study
None
Fig 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curves of absence from regular or similar work for integrated care group and usual care group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cats-Baril WL, Frymoyer JW. The economics of spinal disorders. In: Frymoyer JW, ed. The adult spine: principles of practice. Raven Press, 1991.
    1. Van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. A cost-of-illness study of back pain in the Netherlands. Pain 1995;62:233-40. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Low back pain. Early management for persistent non-specific low back pain. 2009. www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG88NICEGuideline.pdf.
    1. Verbeek JH, Anema JR, Everaert CPJ, Foppen GM, Heymans M, Hloblil H, et al. NVAB-Richtlijn Handelen van de bedrijfsarts bij werknemers met Lage-Rugklachten. 2006. http://nvab.artsennet.nl/Nieuws/Rugklachten-2.htm.
    1. Engers AJ, Wensing M, van Tulder MW, Timmermans A, Oostendorp RA, Koes BW, et al. Implementation of the Dutch low back pain guideline for general practitioners: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine 2005;30:559-600. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data