Women's preference for laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy
- PMID: 20234838
- PMCID: PMC2837244
- DOI: 10.1007/s10397-008-0455-1
Women's preference for laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy
Abstract
In the present study, women's preferences on advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and abdominal hysterectomy (AH) have been studied. Patients' preferences were evaluated in individual, structured interviews in women scheduled for hysterectomy and questionnaires in nurses. Forty-three patients and 39 nurses were included. After general information, 84% of patients and 74% of nurses preferred LH over AH. This preference did not change after supplying more detailed information or after hysterectomy. The avoidance of complications was indicated as the most important factor in the decision. More than half of the women evaluated a difference of 1% as the maximum acceptable risk of major complications. When confronted with scenarios based on current evidence, both patients and nurses prefer LH over AH. This study supports further implementation of LH in clinical practice. The actual major complication rate in hysterectomy, however, is perceived as high.
Figures
Similar articles
-
EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy.Health Technol Assess. 2004 Jun;8(26):1-154. doi: 10.3310/hta8260. Health Technol Assess. 2004. PMID: 15215018 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Morcellation Compared With Abdominal Hysterectomy for Presumed Myomas.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Feb 1;23(2):223-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.025. Epub 2015 Oct 22. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26475764 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Women with Giant Uteri (≥1500 g): Feasibility and Outcomes.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):922-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 17. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27223048
-
[Laparoscopic hysterectomy and urological lesions: risk analysis based on current literature and preventive strategies].Minerva Ginecol. 2008 Aug;60(4):331-7. Minerva Ginecol. 2008. PMID: 18560349 Review. Italian.
-
Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;22(4):304-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32833beab9. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20543687 Review.
Cited by
-
Implementation of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids in the Netherlands: an inventory and preference study.CVIR Endovasc. 2019 Jun 3;2(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s42155-019-0061-5. CVIR Endovasc. 2019. PMID: 32026034 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Uterine manipulators types in total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A retrospective study.Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Jul-Aug;39(4):961-966. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.4.6728. Pak J Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37492311 Free PMC article.
-
Does Uterine Manipulator Type Affect Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy?Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021 Jan 30;10(1):19-24. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_65_20. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2021. PMID: 33747768 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989;5:213–216. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1989.5.213. - DOI
-
- Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R (2005) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003677 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources