Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;6(3):223-228.
doi: 10.1007/s10397-008-0455-1. Epub 2008 Dec 16.

Women's preference for laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy

Women's preference for laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy

Kirsten B Kluivers et al. Gynecol Surg. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

In the present study, women's preferences on advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and abdominal hysterectomy (AH) have been studied. Patients' preferences were evaluated in individual, structured interviews in women scheduled for hysterectomy and questionnaires in nurses. Forty-three patients and 39 nurses were included. After general information, 84% of patients and 74% of nurses preferred LH over AH. This preference did not change after supplying more detailed information or after hysterectomy. The avoidance of complications was indicated as the most important factor in the decision. More than half of the women evaluated a difference of 1% as the maximum acceptable risk of major complications. When confronted with scenarios based on current evidence, both patients and nurses prefer LH over AH. This study supports further implementation of LH in clinical practice. The actual major complication rate in hysterectomy, however, is perceived as high.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Treatment characteristics. The 100% stack bars represent the importance which is assigned to five treatment characteristics of hysterectomy by patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy (AH) or laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), and nurses (N)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989;5:213–216. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1989.5.213. - DOI
    1. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Brit Med J. 2005;330:1478. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1478. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R (2005) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003677 - PubMed
    1. Makinen J, Johansson J, Tomas C, Tomas E, Heinonen PK, Laatikainen T, et al. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1473–1478. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1473. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, Nervo P, Canis M, Botchorishvili R, et al. The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:339–345. doi: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60414-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources