Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a national survey of professionals involved in human subjects protection
- PMID: 20235866
- PMCID: PMC2902178
- DOI: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.83
Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a national survey of professionals involved in human subjects protection
Abstract
The recent expansion of human genetics research has raised complex ethical and regulatory issues. However, few published reports describe the views of professionals involved in human subjects protection (HSP) regarding the risks and benefits of genetic research. This anonymous, web-based study elicited the opinions of 208 HSP professionals about review of genetic research. The majority of respondents felt that different guidance is needed for various aspects of genetic protocol review compared with other types of human subjects research. Importantly, opinions were divided on specific genetic research issues, such as what constitutes human subjects research, when to re-consent, and the likelihood and risks of research participant identification. Findings from this study illustrate the need for a collaborative approach to ethics oversight in the review and conduct of genetic research.
References
-
- Annas GJ. Reforming informed consent to genetic research. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001;286(18):2326–2328. - PubMed
-
- Begley S. Coddling human guinea pigs. Newsweek. 2008;152(7-8):14. - PubMed
-
- Bonetta L, Dove A, Watanabe M. The road to research is paved with restrictions. Nature Medicine. 2003;9(6):630. - PubMed
-
- Collins FS, Morgan M, Patrinos A. The Human Genome Project: lessons learned from large-scale biology. Science. 2003;300(5617):286–290. - PubMed
-
- Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2007 Update with New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-Mode Guide. 2nd. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
