Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section
- PMID: 20236103
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x
Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section
Erratum in
- BJOG. 2010 Jul;117(8):1041
Abstract
Objective: To determine the risk factors, percentage and maternal and perinatal complications of uterine rupture after previous caesarean section.
Design: Population-based registry study.
Population: Mothers with births > or =28 weeks of gestation after previous caesarean section (n = 18 794), registered in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, from 1 January 1999 to 30 June 2005.
Methods: Associations of uterine rupture with risk factors, maternal and perinatal outcome were estimated using cross-tabulations and logistic regression.
Main outcome measure: Odds of uterine rupture.
Results: A total of 94 uterine ruptures were identified (5.0/1000 mothers). Compared with elective prelabour caesarean section, odds of rupture increased for emergency prelabour caesarean section (OR: 8.63; 95% CI: 2.6-28.0), spontaneous labour (OR: 6.65; 95% CI: 2.4-18.6) and induced labour (OR: 12.60; 95% CI: 4.4-36.4). The odds were increased for maternal age > or =40 years versus <30 years (OR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.1-5.5), non-Western (mothers born outside Europe, North America or Australia) origin (OR: 2.87; 95% CI: 1.8-4.7) and gestational age > or =41 weeks versus 37-40 weeks (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.1-2.7). Uterine rupture after trial of labour significantly increased severe postpartum haemorrhage (OR: 8.51; 95% CI: 4.6-15.1), general anaesthesia exposure (OR: 14.20; 95% CI: 9.1-22.2), hysterectomy (OR: 51.36; 95% CI: 13.6-193.4) and serious perinatal outcome (OR: 24.51 (95% CI: 11.9-51.9). Induction by prostaglandins significantly increased the odds for uterine rupture compared with spontaneous labour (OR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.6-4.7). Prelabour ruptures occurred after latent uterine activity or abdominal pain in mothers with multiple or uncommon uterine scars.
Conclusion: Trial of labour carried greater risk and graver outcome of uterine rupture than elective repeated caesarean section, although absolute risks were low. A review of labour management and induction protocol is needed.
Comment in
-
Can vaginal birth after caesarean be justified?BJOG. 2010 Oct;117(11):1426-7; author reply 1427-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02681.x. BJOG. 2010. PMID: 20840694 No abstract available.
-
Changing trends: uterine rupture in the UK.BJOG. 2010 Oct;117(11):1428-9; author reply 1429-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02682.x. BJOG. 2010. PMID: 20840696 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
