Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jun;39(3):860-76.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq001. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

Two-year effects of a school-based prevention programme on adolescent cigarette smoking in Guangzhou, China: a cluster randomized trial

Xiaozhong Wen  1 , Weiqing Chen, Kim M Gans, Suzanne M Colby, Ciyong Lu, Caihua Liang, Wenhua Ling
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Two-year effects of a school-based prevention programme on adolescent cigarette smoking in Guangzhou, China: a cluster randomized trial

Xiaozhong Wen et al. Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of adolescent smoking has been increasing rapidly in China. Theory-based smoking prevention programmes in schools may be an effective approach in preventing smoking among Chinese adolescents.

Methods: A school-level cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted among 7th and 8th grade students (N = 2343) in four junior high schools in southern China during 2004-06. The theory-based, multi-level intervention was compared with the standard health curriculum. Outcome measures comprised changes in students' smoking-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviour.

Results: The mean knowledge scores from baseline to the 1- and 2-year follow-ups increased more in the intervention group than in the control group, whereas there was little change in attitude scores. At the 1-year follow-up (the total sample), the interventions reduced the probability of baseline experimental smokers' escalating to regular smoker [7.9 vs 18.3%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.97, P = 0.043], but did not reduce the probability of baseline non-smokers' initiating smoking (7.9 vs 10.6%; adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.54-1.38, P = 0.538). At the 2-year follow-up (only 7th grade students), similar proportions of baseline non-smokers initiated smoking in the intervention group and the control group (13.5 vs 13.1%), while a possibly lower proportion of baseline experimental smokers escalated to regular smoking in the intervention group than the control group (22.6 vs 40.0%; adjusted OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.12-1.57, P = 0.199).

Conclusions: This multi-level intervention programme had a moderate effect on inhibiting the escalation from experimental to regular smoking among Chinese adolescents, but had little effect on the initiation of smoking. The programme improved adolescents' smoking-related knowledge, but did not change their attitudes towards smoking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The study design and subject flow chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention mapping model of adolescent smoking prevention
Figure 3
Figure 3
The prevalence of ever and regular smoking among cohort I students who completed follow-ups
Figure 4
Figure 4
The prevalence of ever and regular smoking among cohort II students who completed follow-up
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. He J, Gu D, Wu X, et al. Major causes of death among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1124–34. - PubMed
    1. Lam TH, Ho SY. Emerging tobacco hazards in China Is assumption of no association between smoking and other causes of death valid? Br Med J. 1999;318:1554–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lam TH, He Y, Li LS, He SF, Liang BQ. Mortality attributable to cigarette smoking in China. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278:1505–08. - PubMed
    1. Yang G, Ma J, Chen AP, Brown S, Taylor CE, Samet JM. Smoking among adolescents in China: 1998 survey findings. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:1103–10. - PubMed
    1. Yang G, Fan L, Tan J, et al. Smoking in China: findings of the 1996 National Prevalence Survey. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282:1247–53. - PubMed

Publication types