A commentary on the process of peer review and pathology data locking

Affiliations

Jennifer S McKay et al. Toxicol Pathol. 2010 Apr.

. 2010 Apr;38(3):508-10.

doi: 10.1177/0192623310364024. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

No abstract available

Similar articles

A commentary on the process of peer review and pathology data locking.
McKay JS, Barale-Thomas E, Bolon B, George C, Hardisty J, Manabe S, Schorsch F, Teranishi M, Weber K. McKay JS, et al. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2011 Jan;63(1-2):197-8. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Aug 19. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2011. PMID: 20727724 No abstract available.
Recommendations for pathology peer review.
Morton D, Sellers RS, Barale-Thomas E, Bolon B, George C, Hardisty JF, Irizarry A, McKay JS, Odin M, Teranishi M. Morton D, et al. Toxicol Pathol. 2010 Dec;38(7):1118-27. doi: 10.1177/0192623310383991. Epub 2010 Oct 5. Toxicol Pathol. 2010. PMID: 20924082
Pathology peer review from the perspective of an external peer review pathologist.
Mann PC. Mann PC. Toxicol Pathol. 1996 Sep-Oct;24(5):650-3. doi: 10.1177/019262339602400522. Toxicol Pathol. 1996. PMID: 8923692 No abstract available.
Peer review: a constantly-evolving scientific process.
Araújo CG. Araújo CG. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Feb;98(2):e32-5. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012000200017. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22378341 Review. English, Portuguese, Spanish. No abstract available.
Peer review in toxicologic pathology.
Ward JM, Hardisty JF, Hailey JR, Streett CS. Ward JM, et al. Toxicol Pathol. 1995 Mar-Apr;23(2):226-34. doi: 10.1177/019262339502300218. Toxicol Pathol. 1995. PMID: 7569679 Review.

Successful drug development despite adverse preclinical findings part 1: processes to address issues and most important findings.
Ettlin RA, Kuroda J, Plassmann S, Prentice DE. Ettlin RA, et al. J Toxicol Pathol. 2010 Dec;23(4):189-211. doi: 10.1293/tox.23.189. Epub 2010 Dec 16. J Toxicol Pathol. 2010. PMID: 22272031 Free PMC article.