Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;173(1-4):653-67.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1413-8. Epub 2010 Mar 18.

Application of an environmental impact assessment methodology to a site discharging low levels of radioactivity to a freshwater environment in Norway

Affiliations

Application of an environmental impact assessment methodology to a site discharging low levels of radioactivity to a freshwater environment in Norway

Ali Hosseini et al. Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Significant shifts in opinion regarding environmental protection from ionising radiation have resulted in the development and availability of bespoke approaches for the assessment of impacts on wildlife from radioactive contaminants. The application of such assessment methodologies to actual situations, however, remains relatively limited. This paper describes the implementation of the ERICA Integrated Approach and associated tools within the context of routine discharges of radioactive materials to a freshwater environment. The article follows the implementation through its relevant stages and discusses strengths and weaknesses of the approach in relation to the case study. For current discharge levels, 137Cs and 60Co constitute the main dose contributors to the majority of reference organisms studied, although 241Am and 3H are the main contributors for the phyto- and zooplankton categories. Patterns are observed depending on whether the reference organism is sediment-associated or not. At current discharge levels, none of the reference organisms exceeded or approached the selected screening level, and impacts on biota could be regarded as negligible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. J Environ Radioact. 2009 Dec;100(12):1100-8 - PubMed
    1. J Radiol Prot. 2004 Dec;24(4A):A63-77 - PubMed
    1. J Radiol Prot. 2007 Dec;27(4):391-404 - PubMed
    1. J Environ Radioact. 2006;87(1):77-100 - PubMed
    1. J Radiol Prot. 2004 Dec;24(4A):A123-37 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources