Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991 Mar;20(3):242-7.

Antibiotic-impregnated beads. Part I: Bead implantation versus systemic therapy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 2023787
Review

Antibiotic-impregnated beads. Part I: Bead implantation versus systemic therapy

S L Henry et al. Orthop Rev. 1991 Mar.

Abstract

Parenteral antibiotic therapy for acute bone infections, soft-tissue infections, and osteomyelitis may result in high serum concentrations associated with nephrotoxic, ototoxic, and allergic complications. Conversely, the local release of antibiotics into the wound with the use of antibiotic-impregnated cement or antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads has been found effective and does not induce negative effects or result in systemic concentrations of clinical significance. The antibiotic-impregnated cement beads are fabricated on a surgical steel wire, and they have bimodal elution properties. They provide local antibiotic concentrations that surpass the minimum inhibitory concentrations for pathogens commonly isolated in orthopaedic infections. Their use effectively controls chronic osteomyelitis and acute musculoskeletal infections. Compared with systemic antibiotic therapy, the incidence of nephrotoxic, ototoxic, and hypersensitivity reactions is significantly diminished. The beads release 5% of the antibiotic within the first 24 hours. The sustained elution then progressively diminishes to undetectable levels within a few weeks or months.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources