Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;50(6):553-66.
doi: 10.1007/s00117-010-1978-9.

[HRCT of the lung: nodular pattern: anatomy and differential diagnosis]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[HRCT of the lung: nodular pattern: anatomy and differential diagnosis]

[Article in German]
J Biederer et al. Radiologe. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Since the spectrum of differential diagnoses is wide, the interpretation of a nodular pattern in lung lesions detected on CT is a frequent problem. Number, size, localization, and morphology (shape, density, margins) contribute to evaluating the most probable differential diagnosis. "Classical" high resolution CT or high resolution image reconstructions from multiple row detector CT helical acquisitions achieve a detail resolution that makes it possible to distinguish findings by their typical predominance in certain anatomical compartments of the lung. The position of bronchial, vascular and lymphatic structures can be determined down to the secondary pulmonary lobule, the smallest subunit of the lung to be separated by septa of connective tissue. Based on this, a centrilobular predominance of nodules, i.e. with a tree-in-bud pattern, is a frequent sign of bronchiolitis. Perilymphatic predominance in the periphery of the lobules is associated with sarcoidosis or lymphangitic spread of cancer. Random distribution of nodules is interpreted as a sign of hematogenic spread of disease. Hence the subtle interpretation of specific findings on HRCT can contribute substantially to clinical decision making, although these signs may not always replace biopsy and histologic workup.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2004 Feb;14 (2):272-80 - PubMed
    1. Rofo. 2006 Oct;178(10 ):987-98 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2006 Apr;239(1):34-49 - PubMed
    1. Radiographics. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6):1639-52 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):697-722 - PubMed

MeSH terms