How to choose relevant multiple receptor conformations for virtual screening: a test case of Cdk2 and normal mode analysis
- PMID: 20237920
- DOI: 10.1007/s00249-010-0592-0
How to choose relevant multiple receptor conformations for virtual screening: a test case of Cdk2 and normal mode analysis
Abstract
Better treatment of protein flexibility is essential in structure-based drug design projects such as virtual screening and protein-ligand docking. Diversity in ligand-binding mechanisms and receptor conformational changes makes it difficult to treat dynamic features of the receptor during the docking simulation. Thus, the use of pregenerated multiple receptor conformations is applied today in virtual screening studies. However, generation of a small relevant set of receptor conformations remains challenging. To address this problem, we propose a new protocol for the generation of multiple receptor conformations via normal mode analysis and for the selection of several receptor conformations suitable for docking/virtual screening. We validated this protocol on cyclin-dependent kinase 2, which possesses a binding site located at the interface between two subdomains and is known to undergo significant conformational changes in the active site region upon ligand binding. We believe that the suggested rules for the choice of suitable receptor conformations can be applied to other targets when dealing with in silico screening on flexible receptors.
Similar articles
-
Assessing an ensemble docking-based virtual screening strategy for kinase targets by considering protein flexibility.J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Oct 27;54(10):2664-79. doi: 10.1021/ci500414b. Epub 2014 Sep 29. J Chem Inf Model. 2014. PMID: 25233367
-
Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.J Mol Biol. 2004 Mar 12;337(1):209-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.003. J Mol Biol. 2004. PMID: 15001363
-
Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.Nat Protoc. 2016 May;11(5):905-19. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.051. Epub 2016 Apr 14. Nat Protoc. 2016. PMID: 27077332 Free PMC article.
-
Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008 Apr;18(2):178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Feb 25. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008. PMID: 18302984 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Insights on Structural Characteristics and Ligand Binding Mechanisms of CDK2.Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Apr 24;16(5):9314-40. doi: 10.3390/ijms16059314. Int J Mol Sci. 2015. PMID: 25918937 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rational design of small-molecule stabilizers of spermine synthase dimer by virtual screening and free energy-based approach.PLoS One. 2014 Oct 23;9(10):e110884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110884. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25340632 Free PMC article.
-
Discovery of novel checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors by virtual screening based on multiple crystal structures.J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Nov 28;51(11):2904-14. doi: 10.1021/ci200257b. Epub 2011 Oct 12. J Chem Inf Model. 2011. PMID: 21955044 Free PMC article.
-
Polyphony: superposition independent methods for ensemble-based drug discovery.BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Sep 30;15(1):324. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-324. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014. PMID: 25265915 Free PMC article.
-
ENCoM server: exploring protein conformational space and the effect of mutations on protein function and stability.Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jul 1;43(W1):W395-400. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv343. Epub 2015 Apr 16. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015. PMID: 25883149 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-existing soft modes of motion uniquely defined by native contact topology facilitate ligand binding to proteins.Protein Sci. 2011 Oct;20(10):1645-58. doi: 10.1002/pro.711. Epub 2011 Sep 9. Protein Sci. 2011. PMID: 21826755 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources