Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Mar 17:(3):CD000984.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000984.pub2.

Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese people

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese people

Gerd Flodgren et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of obesity is increasing globally and will, if left unchecked, have major implications for both population health and costs to health services.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of strategies to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese people.

Search strategy: We updated the search for primary studies in the following databases, which were all interrogated from the previous (version 2) search date to May 2009: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (which at this time incorporated all EPOC Specialised Register material) (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 1), MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), and PsycINFO (Ovid). We identified further potentially relevant studies from the reference lists of included studies.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared routine provision of care with interventions aimed either at changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals or the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight or obese adults.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality.

Main results: We included six RCTs, involving more than 246 health professionals and 1324 overweight or obese patients. Four of the trials targeted professionals and two targeted the organisation of care. Most of the studies had methodological or reporting weaknesses indicating a risk of bias.Meta-analysis of three trials that evaluated educational interventions aimed at GPs suggested that, compared to standard care, such interventions could reduce the average weight of patients after a year (by 1.2 kg, 95% CI -0.4 to 2.8 kg); however, there was moderate unexplained heterogeneity between their results (I(2) = 41%). One trial found that reminders could change doctors' practice, resulting in a significant reduction in weight among men (by 11.2 kg, 95% CI 1.7 to 20.7 kg) but not among women (who reduced weight by 1.3 kg, 95% CI -4.1 to 6.7 kg). One trial found that patients may lose more weight after a year if the care was provided by a dietitian (by 5.6 kg, 95% CI 4.8 to 6.4 kg) or by a doctor-dietitian team (by 6 kg, 95% CI 5 to 7 kg), as compared with standard care. One trial found no significant difference between standard care and either mail or phone interventions in reducing patients' weight.

Authors' conclusions: Most of the included trials had methodological or reporting weaknesses and were heterogeneous in terms of participants, interventions, outcomes, and settings, so we cannot draw any firm conclusions about the effectiveness of the interventions. All of the evaluated interventions would need further investigation before it was possible to recommend them as effective strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Risk of bias graph: review authors’ assessment of each risk of bias domain presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Risk of bias summary: review authors’ assessment of the risk of bias of the individual domains for each included study.

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

    1. *

    2. Cohen MD, D’Amico FJ, Merenstein JH. Weight reduction in obese hypertensive patients. Family Medicine. 1991;23(1):25–8. - PubMed
    1. Davis Martin P, Rhode PC, Dutton GR, Redmann SM, Ryan DH, Brantley PJ. A primary care weight management intervention for low-income African-American women. Obesity. 2006;14:1412–20. - PubMed
    1. *

    2. Moore H, Summerbell CD, Greenwood DC, Tovey P, Griffiths J, Henderson M, et al. Improving management of obesity in primary care: cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2003;327:1085–8. - PMC - PubMed
    3. Moore H, Summerbell CD, Vail A, Greenwood DC, Adamson AJ. The design features and practicalities of conducting a pragmatic cluster randomized trial of obesity management in primary care. Statistics in Medicine. 2001;20(3):331–40. - PubMed
    1. *

    2. Pritchard DA, Hyndman J, Taba F. Nutritional counselling in general practice: a cost effective analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1999;53(5):311–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haring OM. Report prepared for the National Centre for Health Services Research. Hyattsville; Maryland, USA: May 31. 1976. Improving patient care by automated record summaries. issue Report Number PB–267 486.
    2. *

    3. Rogers JL, Haring OM, Wortman PM, Watson RA, Goetz JP. Medical information systems: assessing impact in the areas of hypertension, obesity and renal disease. Medical Care. 1982;20(1):63–74. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

    1. Ashley JM, Jeor ST, Schrage JP, Perumean-Chaney SE, Gilbertson MC, McCall NL, et al. Weight control in the physician’s office. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2001;161(13):1599–604. - PubMed
    1. Atkinson RL, Greenway FL, Bray GA, Dahms WT, Molitch ME, Hamilton K, et al. Treatment of obesity: comparison of physician and non-physician therapists using placebo and anorectic drugs in a double-blind trial. International Journal of Obesity. 1977;1(2):113–20. - PubMed
    1. Balch P, Balch K. Establishing a campus-wide behavioral weight reduction program through a university student health service: the use and training of health service personnel as behavioral weight therapists. Journal of the American College Health Association. 1976;25(2):148–52. - PubMed
    1. Ben-Noun L. Comparison of physician-led and dietitian-led weight reducing programs [Hebrew] Harefuah. 1988;114(10):488–90. - PubMed
    1. Boltri JM, Okosun I, vis-Smith YM, Seale JP, Roman P, Tobin BW. A simple nurse-based prompt increases screening and prevention counseling for diabetes. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2007;1:81–7. - PubMed

Additional references

    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics . National Health Survey, 2007-08. Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2008.
    1. Brownell K, Puhl R. Stigma and discrimination in weight management and obesity. The Permanente Journal. 2003;7:21–23.
    1. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65. - PubMed
    1. Colquitt J, Clegg A, Loveman E, Royle P, Sidhu MK. Surgery for morbid obesity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005;(Issue 4) [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub2] - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, CONSORT Group The CONSORTstatement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–4. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

    1. Harvey EL, Glenny A-M, Kirk SFL, Summerbell C. A systematic review of interventions to improve health professionals’ management of obesity. International Journal of Obesity. 1999;23:1213–22. - PubMed
    1. Harvey EL, Glenny AM, Kirk FL, Summerbell CD. An updated systematic review of interventions to improve health professionals’ management of obesity. Obesity reviews. 2002;3:45–55. - PubMed