Confidentiality for whom?
- PMID: 2024137
- DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90105-l
Confidentiality for whom?
Abstract
Confidentiality has been argued to be a cornerstone both of medical and social research encounters, particularly because of the protection it offers for patients and informants. In practice the idea of confidentiality is fractured. Professional interests in the organisation of medical work, and concerns for the collective interest amongst social researchers may lead to individual confidentiality being undermined. In addition discrepancies in the ethical positions and practices of social researchers and those in biomedicine may produce further problems for the maintenance of confidentiality.
Similar articles
-
Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research: how do we respect autonomy?NATNEWS. 1993 Jan;2(10 Suppl):S1-5. NATNEWS. 1993. PMID: 11659672 No abstract available.
-
Some ethical implications of qualitative research.Res Nurs Health. 1989 Feb;12(1):57-63. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770120109. Res Nurs Health. 1989. PMID: 2922491
-
Research participation as a contract.Ethics Behav. 1995;5(3):205-15. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0503_1. Ethics Behav. 1995. PMID: 11660017
-
Using clients.Nurs Ethics. 1997 Nov;4(6):465-71. doi: 10.1177/096973309700400603. Nurs Ethics. 1997. PMID: 9416105 Review.
-
Human experimentation. Protecting patient autonomy through informed consent.J Leg Med. 1997 Jun;18(2):221-50. doi: 10.1080/01947649709511033. J Leg Med. 1997. PMID: 9230568 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Secrets in primary care: a qualitative exploration and conceptual model.J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1246-53. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0186-4. Epub 2007 May 9. J Gen Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17487521 Free PMC article.