Brushing cytology of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Obsolete or not?

Abstract

The merit of brushing cytology of the upper gastrointestinal tract has been questioned since it appears to duplicate biopsy. To determine its value, the reports on all endoscopic biopsy and cytology specimens from a one-year period were reviewed. The 683 procedures included 481 in which only a histologic biopsy sample was obtained, 47 in which only a cytologic brushing sample was obtained and 155 in which both types of samples were obtained ("combined specimens"). Among the 155 combined specimens, 4 of the confirmed malignancies were detected by histology only while 2 were detected by cytology only. A diagnosis of suspicious or positive for malignancy was made for 20% of the combined specimens as compared to less than 5% of the biopsy-only or brushing-only specimens. While 15% of the specimens that included a brushing sample (either alone or with biopsy) showed fungal infections, only 1.2% of the biopsy-only specimens did. It appears that the clinicians at this hospital tend to use brushing in combination with biopsy when either a malignancy or a fungal infection is suspected. Other empiric advantages of endoscopic brushing cytology include its rapid turn-around time, minimal invasiveness and good recognition of lymphoid cells. The selective use of brushing cytology should increase the probability of detecting malignancies and fungal infections without any increased risk or discomfort to the patients.