Risk-benefit assessment of anticoagulant therapy
- PMID: 2029354
- DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199106010-00006
Risk-benefit assessment of anticoagulant therapy
Abstract
Thromboembolic disease is a common medical condition which, if untreated, carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Treatment with anticoagulant therapy, while clearly beneficial, may expose patients to potentially serious side effects. A thoughtful risk-benefit assessment is therefore crucial before initiating therapy. Thromboembolic disease involves syndromes of both the venous and arterial circulation, and its pathogenesis is best understood by considering the elements of Virchow's Triad. This model defines the risk factors for venous thromboembolism and allows us to classify surgical and medical patients into low, moderate and high risk groups. Similar analysis allows risk assessment for patients prone to cardiogenic embolism resulting from nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, ischaemic heart disease, rheumatic heart disease and valvular prostheses. All anticoagulant therapy is prophylactic. Primary prophylaxis involves instituting anticoagulant therapy in patients at risk, before thromboembolism occurs, while secondary prophylaxis involves treating patients with established disease. The 2 major anticoagulants, heparin and warfarin, differ in their mechanism of action, mode of administration and methods of monitoring. Either may be used as primary or secondary prophylaxis. Heparin, because it acts immediately, is the drug of choice for the short term treatment of thromboembolic disease. Warfarin is the drug of choice for long term oral maintenance therapy. The principal complication of heparin therapy is haemorrhage, although thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis may also occur; the complications of warfarin include haemorrhage and skin necrosis. The risks of complications vary with the underlying thromboembolic disease. After the benefits of treatment are weighed against the risks of complications, recommendations for therapy can be established. The use of anticoagulants in pregnancy is especially complex. Here heparin is probably the preferred agent since, unlike warfarin, it does not cross the placenta and is nonteratogenic.
Similar articles
-
[Heart disease, anticoagulants and pregnancy].Rev Esp Cardiol. 2001;54 Suppl 1:8-16. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11535183 Review. Spanish.
-
Treating patients with venous thromboembolism: initial strategies and long-term secondary prevention.Semin Vasc Med. 2005 Aug;5(3):276-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-916167. Semin Vasc Med. 2005. PMID: 16123915
-
Anticoagulants in pregnancy.Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Jun;13(2):349-63. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1986. PMID: 2426029 Review.
-
Anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves: no easy option.Thromb Res. 2011 Feb;127 Suppl 3:S56-60. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(11)70016-0. Thromb Res. 2011. PMID: 21262443
-
Anticoagulants and thrombolytics during pregnancy.Semin Perinatol. 1997 Apr;21(2):149-53. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(97)80058-4. Semin Perinatol. 1997. PMID: 9201821 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of anticoagulants on fibrin clot structure: A comparison between vitamin K antagonists and factor Xa inhibitors.Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Oct 25;4(8):1269-1281. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12443. eCollection 2020 Nov. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020. PMID: 33313466 Free PMC article.
-
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Patients Undergoing Facelift.Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 Apr 12;4:ojac024. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac024. eCollection 2022. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022. PMID: 35601235 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical