Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jul;121(1-2):261-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.03.035. Epub 2010 Mar 16.

Comparison of the effects of eldecalcitol and alfacalcidol on bone and calcium metabolism

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of the effects of eldecalcitol and alfacalcidol on bone and calcium metabolism

Toshio Matsumoto et al. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Eldecalcitol [ED-71, 2beta-(3-hydroxypropyloxy)-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3] increases lumbar and hip bone mineral density (BMD) in a dose-dependent manner in osteoporotic patients with vitamin D supplementation. However, there has been no head-to-head comparison of the effects of eldecalcitol with alfacalcidol on bone and calcium metabolism in human subjects. Therefore, a randomized open-label clinical trial was conducted to compare the effect of eldecalcitol on bone turnover markers and calcium metabolism in 59 Japanese postmenopausal women. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 1.0 microg alfacalcidol, 0.5 or 1.0 microg eldecalcitol once a day for 12 weeks. There was almost no increase in serum calcium (Ca) throughout the study period. Eldecalcitol from 0.5 to 1.0 microg increased daily urinary Ca excretion in a dose-dependent manner, and 1.0 microg eldecalcitol increased urinary Ca to a similar extent to 1.0 microg alfacalcidol. Both 0.5 and 1.0 microg eldecalcitol suppressed urinary NTX stronger than 1.0 microg alfacalcidol (-6, -30 and -35% in 1.0 microg alfacalcidol, 0.5 and 1.0 microg eldecalcitol-treated groups, respectively, at 12 weeks). In contrast, changes in serum BALP were similar among the three groups (-22, -22 and -29% in 1.0 microg alfacalcidol, 0.5 and 1.0 microg eldecalcitol-treated groups, respectively, at 12 weeks). These results demonstrate that 0.5-1.0 microg eldecalcitol can effectively inhibit bone resorption stronger than alfacalcidol with a similar effect on bone formation and a comparable effect on urinary Ca excretion, and suggest that eldecalcitol may have a better osteoprotective effect than alfacalcidol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources